Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add profile_banner_url to v2 User object #13

Open
HitomaruKonpaku opened this issue May 7, 2022 · 9 comments
Open

Add profile_banner_url to v2 User object #13

HitomaruKonpaku opened this issue May 7, 2022 · 9 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@HitomaruKonpaku
Copy link

Hi,

As title said, can we have profile_banner_url return in API v2 users lookup?

I saw many people asking for it too. See: https://twittercommunity.com/t/profile-banner-url/155807

@andypiper
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @HitomaruKonpaku - thank you for your suggestion. The process for the Open Evolution repository shows how you can go about having this feature considered by our engineering team. We require a Pull Request to be submitted following the appropriate template before we will initiate a formal internal review process.

This issue is a great start, as a discussion. Can you expand on why this is a useful addition for you / what the wider use case is, and how you might expect to have the data returned from the API?

@HitomaruKonpaku
Copy link
Author

Hi @andypiper , thank you for your reply.

As I see in the process, I should make an issue to discuss about it before actually making a PR, so I landed here.

As for the profile_banner_url field, I followed a lot of artist with cool/nice banner profile so I made a bot to check for their profile to look for any change & save them.

I expect to have nullable profile_banner_url under User object (same as v1 User object).

{
  "id": "916156645004029952",
  "username": "hololivetv",
  ...
  "profile_image_url": "..."
  "profile_banner_url": "https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_banners/916156645004029952/1575255602"
}

@metaglobal
Copy link

metaglobal commented Jul 28, 2022

Can't this field be added yet? Everyone needs him so much. Waiting too long?
Is the team not working?

@andypiper
Copy link
Contributor

andypiper commented Jul 28, 2022

Just a reminder that in order to contribute a feature for direct consideration by the engineering team, there's a workflow via opening a pull request on this repository, that requires a specific format.

As an additional reminder, if you'd like to participate in the discussion please be respectful and follow the Twitter OSS code of conduct. Thank you!

@dickhardt
Copy link

created #31

@dickhardt
Copy link

@metaglobal @HitomaruKonpaku @andypiper see submitted pull request

@andypiper
Copy link
Contributor

Unfortunately I’m no longer able to work on this project.

@dickhardt
Copy link

@andypiper too bad for us.

@ktecho
Copy link

ktecho commented Apr 25, 2023

Any new on this? In 5 days the v1 API will stop working and there is not an alternative in v2?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants