You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Note: frequentist heterogeneity estimates (and hence R^2) will very easily tend toward extremes and therefore be misleading. See this example:
library(metafor)
k <- 100
x <- rnorm(k,0,1)
dt <- data.frame(se = rep(2, k),
x,
tau = x + rnorm(k, 10, 1))
plot(tau ~ x, data = dt)
lm(tau~x, weights=1/se,data=dt) %>% summary()
lm(tau~x, data=dt) %>% summary()
rma(yi=tau,sei=se,data=dt,mods=~x)
Try changing SE to 0.1, 0.5, 1, 2 etc. and see how R^2 seems to only be estimated similarly to lm when SE is very low
wwiecek
changed the title
add R^2 calculations
add R^2 calculations, fix pooling for models with covariates
Jun 7, 2022
wwiecek
changed the title
add R^2 calculations, fix pooling for models with covariates
for models with covariates: add R^2 calculations, fix pooling
Jun 7, 2022
Reading material:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: