Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Reinstate 'tmp' Command for User Convenience #2

Open
scolastico opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 1 comment
Open

Reinstate 'tmp' Command for User Convenience #2

scolastico opened this issue Aug 30, 2023 · 1 comment

Comments

@scolastico
Copy link
Contributor

Hi, I've reviewed your recent commits and, for the most part, they look good. However, I'd like to request that you reinstate the "tmp" command instead of "temp," as I initially proposed in my pull request. The reason I submitted the PR in the first place, along with other changes, was to address this common typing error that I suspect many others would make as well.

While I understand this is your code, repository, and add-on, it can be frustrating to be constantly corrected with a message like "no, it's 'temp,' not 'tmp.'" Such small issues can be more annoying than they need to be. You had previously suggested that I could create a fork, but to be honest, I'm not a fan of forking over something so minor.

Please reconsider your latest changes. Thank you.

@wtetsu
Copy link
Owner

wtetsu commented Aug 31, 2023

The premise in the first place, I don't really care whether I use tmpfile or tempfile, since I use a shortcut key to activate the function.

However, since the name of the extension is "tempfile", the command is also tempfile, and I don't like to create multiple commands that do the same thing, as it may cause minor confusion to users.

If for some reason you do not want to use shortcut keys, and you want to invoke a function with the name of your favorite command, you can use Command Alias or some other way to achieve this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants