Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
124 lines (47 loc) · 4.97 KB

summarize-dialogue.md

File metadata and controls

124 lines (47 loc) · 4.97 KB
Raw

Summarize Dialogue | Start Chat

The prompt essentially combines artificial intelligence and human intelligence to generate a structured meeting summary. This is done through Information Extraction, a Natural Language Processing (NLP) technique that allows extracting critical information from the unstructured text of a meeting transcript.

Using the AI model, the system can extract key elements like main discussions, decisions made, questions raised, and contributions from each participant from the raw transcript. This ability to sift through large amounts of data and distill important points can significantly increase the efficiency of post-meeting tasks and ensure no crucial information is lost or overlooked.

However, AI models, as of now, have limitations in understanding specific contexts or nuances. For those aspects like conflict resolution, emotional tone, action items, next steps, and visual summary, the system prompts for user inputs. These elements often require a human's interpretation and subject

Prompt

"Based on the meeting transcript, summarize the key discussions, decisions made, questions raised, and contributions of each participant.

Meeting Transcript: 
{meetingTranscription:'[****]'}

Please provide additional details about the following:

- Action Items:
    1. {actionItem1:'[Action item description, who is assigned to, and the deadline]'}
    2. {actionItem2:'[Action item description, who is assigned to, and the deadline]'}

- Conflict Resolution: {conflictResolution:'[Description of the conflict resolution]'}

- Emotional Tone: {emotionalTone:'[Overall emotional tone of the meeting]'}

- Next Steps: {nextSteps:'[Outline of any plans for future meetings or tasks]'}

- Visual Summary: {visualSummary:'[URL to a mind map or flowchart of the meeting]'}"
 {{keyDiscussions}} {{decisionsMade}} {{actionItems}} {{questionsRaised}} {{participantsContributions}} {{conflictResolution}} {{emotionalTone}} {{nextSteps}} {{visualSummary}}

Welcome Message

Key Discussions: The primary discussions revolved around the project timeline, budget constraints, and the latest market trends affecting our product line. Concerns were raised about the feasibility of meeting the new project deadline and the costs associated with the proposed green practices.

Decisions Made: The team agreed to extend the project deadline by two weeks and to incorporate more green, sustainable practices in our manufacturing process.

Questions Raised: Concerns were raised about the feasibility of meeting the new project deadline and the costs associated with the proposed green practices.

Contributions of Each Participant:

  • Participant 1 (John): John emphasized the importance of sustainable practices and suggested some budget adjustments.

  • Participant 2 (Mary): Mary argued for the extension of the project timeline and volunteered to liaise with the client.

Action Items:

  1. Action Item 1: John has been assigned to finalize the budget report by July 15th.

  2. Action Item 2: Mary will organize a follow-up meeting with the client next Tuesday.

Conflict Resolution: No specific details about conflict resolution were provided.

Emotional Tone: The meeting was constructive and engaging, with participants openly sharing ideas and concerns.

Next Steps: The team will reconvene next Wednesday to discuss updates.

Visual Summary: Here is a visual summary of the meeting

Conversation

ASSISTANT: Key Discussions: The primary discussions revolved around the project timeline, budget constraints, and the latest market trends affecting our product line. Concerns were raised about the feasibility of meeting the new project deadline and the costs associated with the proposed green practices.

Decisions Made: The team agreed to extend the project deadline by two weeks and to incorporate more green, sustainable practices in our manufacturing process.

Questions Raised: Concerns were raised about the feasibility of meeting the new project deadline and the costs associated with the proposed green practices.

Contributions of Each Participant:

  • Participant 1 (John): John emphasized the importance of sustainable practices and suggested some budget adjustments.

  • Participant 2 (Mary): Mary argued for the extension of the project timeline and volunteered to liaise with the client.

Action Items:

  1. Action Item 1: John has been assigned to finalize the budget report by July 15th.

  2. Action Item 2: Mary will organize a follow-up meeting with the client next Tuesday.

Conflict Resolution: No specific details about conflict resolution were provided.

Emotional Tone: The meeting was constructive and engaging, with participants openly sharing ideas and concerns.

Next Steps: The team will reconvene next Wednesday to discuss updates.

Visual Summary: Here is a visual summary of the meeting