Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

"at exactly 0 or more" should be "(exactly) 0 or more"? #449

Open
carlonim opened this issue Oct 30, 2022 · 2 comments
Open

"at exactly 0 or more" should be "(exactly) 0 or more"? #449

carlonim opened this issue Oct 30, 2022 · 2 comments

Comments

@carlonim
Copy link

carlonim commented Oct 30, 2022

Proposed labels: ErratumRaised, model
In section 3.3.6 Rights information > table describing the Model > description of term rights:
the current text is "There may be at exactly 0 or more rights statements or licenses". I wonder if it should be corrected to "There may be exactly 0 or more rights statements or licenses", thus deleting the "at" before "exactly".
In addition, maybe "exactly" is not necessary in this context. All other mentions of this cardinality in the document do not contain the word "exactly" (only "0 or more"). If I am not wrong, "exactly" should be limited to cardinalities like "exactly 1", not those that allow multiple occurrences?

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Oct 31, 2022

Thanks, @carlonim, that is indeed a valid erratum. In my view, the proper text should be (as in other similar cases in the spec):

There may be 0 or more rights statements or licenses.

@iherman
Copy link
Member

iherman commented Oct 31, 2022

Summary: Text should be changed to "There may be 0 or more…"

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants