Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should ACT require the formats for rules to be localizable? #575

Open
bert-github opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Should ACT require the formats for rules to be localizable? #575

bert-github opened this issue Oct 17, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.

Comments

@bert-github
Copy link

(This is part of the i18n review.)

  1. ACT Rule Structure
    https://www.w3.org/TR/2024/WD-act-rules-format-1.1-20240618/#act-rule-structure

quote_the_text

ACT requires formats for storing rules to be able to contain human-readable text and be accessible (e.g., HTML,
DOCX or PDF), but does not require that they are localizable. (Or does ‘accessible’ implies being localizable?)

@bert-github bert-github added the i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on. label Oct 17, 2024
@daniel-montalvo
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @bert-github

Certainly I think it was the intent to make internationalization easier by having the format be accessible. But I think we could clarify this more.

What about changing:

In addition to supporting people with disabilities, using an accessible format also makes internationalization of ACT Rules easier.

to

In addition to supporting people with disabilities, using an accessible and localizable format also makes internationalization of ACT Rules easier.

Would this change solve this issue?

We are open to other ways we can clarify this, though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
i18n-needs-resolution Issue the Internationalization Group has raised and looks for a response on.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants