Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[use-cases] it should be clear in §3 that considering accessibility is more about human practice/policy than software #216

Open
cookiecrook opened this issue Jan 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

[use-cases] it should be clear in §3 that considering accessibility is more about human practice/policy than software #216

cookiecrook opened this issue Jan 24, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
editorial Spelling and grammar fixes, typos, and other small changes that do not alter meaning Please Review This item needs wide review before being added to the agenda

Comments

@cookiecrook
Copy link

cookiecrook commented Jan 24, 2023 •
edited
Loading

End of §3: Final sentence is: "In this document we intentionally presume that content providers are doing their best to consider accessibility to the extent they reasonably can."

Consider adding something indicating that "their best" is not just technical means such as automation and software development, but includes company-internal policy/practices/oversight, stakeholder education/training for employees and non-employee content creators, and other methods.
@cwadamsoforacle cwadamsoforacle transferred this issue from w3c/silver Jan 10, 2025
@cwadamsoforacle cwadamsoforacle added editorial Spelling and grammar fixes, typos, and other small changes that do not alter meaning Please Review This item needs wide review before being added to the agenda labels Jan 10, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
editorial Spelling and grammar fixes, typos, and other small changes that do not alter meaning Please Review This item needs wide review before being added to the agenda
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@cookiecrook @cwadamsoforacle