Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

testing rdf:JSON #139

Closed
pfps opened this issue Jun 29, 2024 · 6 comments
Closed

testing rdf:JSON #139

pfps opened this issue Jun 29, 2024 · 6 comments

Comments

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor

pfps commented Jun 29, 2024

How will rdf:JSON be tested?

@pfps
Copy link
Contributor Author

pfps commented Jun 29, 2024

Closing because this repository is not connected to the RDF-star WG bulletin board.

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Jun 30, 2024

w3c/rdf-star-wg#125

@afs
Copy link
Contributor

afs commented Jun 30, 2024

This is a community effort.

Tests get written and a PR submitted.

Contributions welcome.

@afs afs closed this as completed Jun 30, 2024
@TallTed
Copy link
Member

TallTed commented Jul 1, 2024

@pchampin --

Please see #139 (comment).

Please add this repo (w3c/rdf-tests) to the RDF-star WG project dashboard.

@pchampin
Copy link
Contributor

pchampin commented Jul 4, 2024

Please add this repo (w3c/rdf-tests) to the RDF-star WG project dashboard.

It is already connected, but only PRs are included in the dashboard... I searched the minutes but didn't find any recorded rationale for that (although my action was explicitly about the PRs). I suspect that we considered that many issues in this repo were not in scope for the RDF-star WG...

We can always change our mind, of course.

@gkellogg
Copy link
Member

gkellogg commented Jul 4, 2024

Maybe there’s a way to use issue tags to filter those that show up in our dashboard. We need to synchronize over more RDF-star issue labels, too.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants