You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I see mention of inline-size, block-size, and writing modes in relation to Example 3 specifically. But should I assume aspect-ratio will simply be physically mapping x/y, like the physical width/height language in the linked ratio definition of mediaqueries-4?
And then this is just another place for the Flow-Relative Keyword to enable logical mapping?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
If this is similar enough to the discussion/resolution in #4531 (comment) for contain-intrinsic-size, I'm guessing this can be closed and just hope for a sufficient resolution to #1282. Though unlike the physical properties discussed in #1282, aspect-ratio/contain-intrinsic-size don't have corresponding logical longhands for the time being.
https://drafts.csswg.org/css-sizing-4/#aspect-ratio
#3757 (comment)
I see mention of
inline-size
,block-size
, and writing modes in relation to Example 3 specifically. But should I assumeaspect-ratio
will simply be physically mapping x/y, like the physical width/height language in the linked ratio definition of mediaqueries-4?And then this is just another place for the Flow-Relative Keyword to enable logical mapping?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: