You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Per CSS Multicol 1, if column-rule-style is none or hidden, then the computed value of column-rule-width will be 0.
Gaps 1 extends the definitions of the column-rule-* properties to allow for lists of values. It also seeks to preserve the existing behavior noted above for backwards compatibility. But in what cases should the backward compatibility behavior apply? I can see a couple of reasonable possibilities:
If column-rule-style contains exactly one value and that value is none or hidden, then the computed value of column-rule-width is 0.
If column-rule-style contains nothing other than none, hidden, or repeaters containing nothing other than none or hidden, then the computed value of column-rule-width is 0.
My inclination is towards 1. Does the WG agree? Any options I might have missed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Per CSS Multicol 1, if
column-rule-style
isnone
orhidden
, then the computed value ofcolumn-rule-width
will be 0.Gaps 1 extends the definitions of the column-rule-* properties to allow for lists of values. It also seeks to preserve the existing behavior noted above for backwards compatibility. But in what cases should the backward compatibility behavior apply? I can see a couple of reasonable possibilities:
column-rule-style
contains exactly one value and that value isnone
orhidden
, then the computed value ofcolumn-rule-width
is0
.column-rule-style
contains nothing other thannone
,hidden
, or repeaters containing nothing other thannone
orhidden
, then the computed value ofcolumn-rule-width
is0
.My inclination is towards 1. Does the WG agree? Any options I might have missed?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: