Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Ambiguity in 3.1.6.2 #602

Open
xfq opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Ambiguity in 3.1.6.2 #602

xfq opened this issue Feb 1, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@xfq
Copy link
Member

xfq commented Feb 1, 2024

https://www.w3.org/TR/clreq/#h-adjustment_of_adjacent_punctuation_marks

In principle, any two adjacent punctuation marks that are 2 em wide should be reduced to 1.5 em. Following the same principle, they may be reduced to 1 em for certain typographic styles.

Suggestion from @r12a (in order to avoid ambiguity):

In principle, any two adjacent punctuation marks that together are 2 em wide should be reduced to 1.5 em. Following the same principle, they may be reduced to 1 em for certain typographic styles.

@kirklin
Copy link
Contributor

kirklin commented Feb 8, 2024

I propose changing the Chinese translation from [原则上的调整度应为:如果任意两个相邻标点符号占用2个字宽,应当缩减成1.5个字宽。在此原则上,允许排版风格进一步调整让两个符号只占1个字宽。] to [基本原则是,任何两个相邻的标点符号如果占据2个字宽,应缩减至1.5个字宽。按照同样的原则,某些排版风格可以将它们缩减至1个字宽。].

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants