-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 61
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Mention explicitly that Link#name can also be a nameMap #486
Comments
Will you make a concrete PR that adds the clarity you think would be better? |
Yes, I could, however:
And I am not a member. |
The WG has wound down since a few months ago so I don't think you should
pay attention to that.
…On Thu, Sep 13, 2018, 10:17 AM Arnold Schrijver ***@***.***> wrote:
Yes, I could, however:
Pull requests will be accepted only if the
submitter is a current member of the W3C Social WG but
issues can be opened by anyone.
And I am not a member.
—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#486 (comment)>,
or mute the thread
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAKfBtYeZ5Dsl7igUPr24KuMh94TFsekks5uaiKRgaJpZM4VCenP>
.
|
Thanks. I made the changes (also reordered properties on |
Based on this suggestion, in issue triage, we reviewed all the properties with domain The PR is here: #553 I'll try to get this included. We have a lot of ERRATA backed up! |
This should also be added to the SocialCG agenda for next month. |
Please Indicate One:
Please Describe the Issue in https://www.w3.org/TR/activitystreams-core:
Link#name:
nameMap
, in the section describing Link (par. 4.2), there is only mention ofname
, while the definition ofname
in Vocabulary states thatnameMap
property is valid for Links as well. Should mention that in core spec too, for clarity.As an editorial issue, it would be better to explicitly mention this in the document, IMHO.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: