-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 0
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Infinite distance (trigonometric): non-iterative, too? #31
Comments
pedir ajuda para Fujimura, Vuorinen et al. |
rascunho: Dear Dr. Vuorinen, we'd like to respectfully ask if your research group could help us with the following mathematical problem.
In our application, the transmitting source is a GPS satellite at 20,000 km altitude and the receiving antenna is only a few meters above the Earth's surface, assumed spherical with 6,000 km radius. |
I would only change the information about Earth radius, that we use the average radius of approximately 6370 km. Then, the email draft is: Dear Dr. Vuorinen, We'd like to respectfully ask if your research group could help us with the following mathematical problem.
In our application, the transmitting source is a GPS satellite at 20,000 km altitude and the receiving antenna is only a few meters above the Earth's surface, assuming a sphere with a 6,370 km radius. Regards, Vitor Hugo de Almeida Junior Do you agree with this draft @fgnievinski? I will send it scheduled for Monday. |
parece bom
…On Fri., May 5, 2023, 21:13 Vitor Hugo de Almeida Junior, < ***@***.***> wrote:
I would only change the information about Earth radius, that we use the
average radius of approximately 6370 km. Then, the email draft is:
Dear Dr. Vuorinen,
We'd like to respectfully ask if your research group could help us with
the following mathematical problem.
- Would it be possible to simplify the quartic involved in the
Ptolemy-Alhazen problem by assuming the source is at infinite distance,
i.e., defined only by the direction angles?
In our application, the transmitting source is a GPS satellite at 20,000
km altitude and the receiving antenna is only a few meters above the
Earth's surface, assuming a sphere with a 6,370 km radius.
Regards,
Vitor Hugo de Almeida Junior
PhD student at Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul
Do you agree with this draft @fgnievinski <https://github.com/fgnievinski>?
I will send it scheduled for Monday.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#31 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABGJHBAAIMGCOMYVYEO6P2DXEWJR7ANCNFSM6AAAAAATZ46NGY>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Response from Dr. Vuorinen: Dear Mr. Vitor Hugo De Almeida Junior, Thank you for your email. We will think about this and inform you about our ideas, if any. Best regards, M Vuorinen |
Response from Dr. VuorinenDear Mr. Vitor Hugo De Almeida Junior, The solution to the "source at infinite-distance" Ptolemy-Alhazen problem that you posed is attached. We are currently working on a manuscript on related questions will perhaps include Please keep me informed about your work on this topic and whether you will use Sincerely, Matti Vuorinen |
Dr. Vuorinen also send the following: Dear Mr. Vitor Hugo De Almeida Junior, Good to hear. I have a Mathematica notebook on this and I can send it to you Good luck for your research! M Vuorinen |
I implement Vuorinen's model in the geo-alhazen repository in the following commit (ba83c99).
|
Questions about this model:
|
I started discussions about Vuorinen's algorithm and results at #38. |
here's a revised implementation, with grazing angle and interferometric delay more consistent with the assumption of infinite distance; the calculation of the specular position was unaffected:
|
Updates based on your previous suggestions: New m file: Updates: |
I've made changes in your code to run it properly. However, it should be revised to confirm it is correct. get_grazing_angle_infiniteYour suggestion My change: get_spherical_reflectionYour suggestions
My change:
|
For e>0, these suggested changes are working well but for e<=0 they aren't. I continue the discussion about this issue in https://github.com/ufrgs-gnss-lab/atm-interf-sph-dev/issues/61 |
I updated the function get_grazing_angle_infinite where I corrected the grazing angle computation Also, I updated get_spherical_reflection_vuorinen where I corrected the geocentric angle between antenna and specular point. |
it seems the solution should not be restricted to the iterative or numerical case -- it'd be possible to obtain a trigonometric solution for infinite distance based on a preliminary solution for finite distance using analytical algorithms, no?
another question: does the infinite distance assumption keep the finite-distance specular point unchanged (position coordinates and geocentric angle and arc_len)?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: