New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

compare nominal closed formulas to ray tracing #8

Open

fgnievinski opened this issue Mar 17, 2023 · 0 comments

Contributor

fgnievinski commented Mar 17, 2023 •

edited

Loading

Originally posted by @fgnievinski in #1 (comment)

could you compare this nominal case to ray-tracing (for a horizontal surface and atmosphere), please?

you can reuse the scripts previously used here:
https://github.com/ufrgs-gnss-lab/atm-interf-rtr-dev/issues/3

here is the updated m library:
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Gf6lLfnzvEMppD0XAAW_e_-UeeqDK1OW/view?usp=sharing
~~https://drive.google.com/file/d/1E6UQ14sHqTEVRH0KZBTNsS7plK6x5DYZ/view?usp=sharing~~

PS: refractivity for the nominal case should be taken from the RTR results.

fgnievinski mentioned this issue

implement nominal closed formulas #1

Closed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment