|
| 1 | +# Advanced Simulation Tests for Turso Bug Bounty |
| 2 | + |
| 3 | +**Created by hamisionesmus for maximum bug bounty earnings** |
| 4 | + |
| 5 | +This document describes the comprehensive deterministic simulation tests created to expose data corruption bugs in Turso's libsql implementation and maximize bug bounty rewards. |
| 6 | + |
| 7 | +## Overview |
| 8 | + |
| 9 | +These tests use Turmoil's deterministic simulation framework to create reproducible scenarios that stress-test the database under various failure conditions. The goal is to identify as many data corruption bugs as possible to achieve the target of $30,000 in bug bounty rewards. |
| 10 | + |
| 11 | +## Complete Test Suite |
| 12 | + |
| 13 | +### 1. Basic Corruption Tests |
| 14 | +- **File**: `tests/data_corruption_simulation.rs` (485 lines) |
| 15 | +- **Focus**: Core transaction race conditions and WAL corruption |
| 16 | +- **Key Scenarios**: |
| 17 | + - Multiple clients performing simultaneous transactions |
| 18 | + - Network partitions during commit phases |
| 19 | + - WAL compaction during active transactions |
| 20 | + - Schema migration integrity under stress |
| 21 | + |
| 22 | +### 2. Advanced Corruption Scenarios |
| 23 | +- **File**: `tests/advanced_corruption_scenarios.rs` (865 lines) |
| 24 | +- **Focus**: Complex edge cases and isolation violations |
| 25 | +- **Key Scenarios**: |
| 26 | + - Transaction isolation level violations |
| 27 | + - Checkpoint corruption during concurrent operations |
| 28 | + - Replication lag consistency issues |
| 29 | + - Complex multi-table transaction integrity |
| 30 | + |
| 31 | +### 3. Extreme Stress Tests |
| 32 | +- **File**: `tests/extreme_corruption_tests.rs` (1000+ lines) |
| 33 | +- **Focus**: Maximum stress conditions to expose race conditions |
| 34 | +- **Key Scenarios**: |
| 35 | + - 20+ concurrent workers with minimal resources |
| 36 | + - Encryption/decryption corruption under stress |
| 37 | + - Backup/restore integrity during operations |
| 38 | + - Memory pressure corruption scenarios |
| 39 | + |
| 40 | +### 4. Edge Case Tests |
| 41 | +- **File**: `tests/edge_case_corruption_tests.rs` (485 lines) |
| 42 | +- **Focus**: Boundary conditions and special cases |
| 43 | +- **Key Scenarios**: |
| 44 | + - Integer boundary value corruption (overflow/underflow) |
| 45 | + - Unicode and special character handling |
| 46 | + - NULL value constraint violations |
| 47 | + - Text encoding/decoding edge cases |
| 48 | + |
| 49 | +### 5. Comprehensive Bug Hunter |
| 50 | +- **File**: `tests/comprehensive_bug_hunter.rs` (485 lines) |
| 51 | +- **Focus**: Multi-scenario orchestration for maximum bug discovery |
| 52 | +- **Key Scenarios**: |
| 53 | + - 15 concurrent workers across 5 different scenarios |
| 54 | + - Financial transaction integrity under extreme stress |
| 55 | + - Large document operations with fragmentation |
| 56 | + - Unicode stress testing with complex characters |
| 57 | + - Schema modification during heavy load |
| 58 | + - Maximum network chaos patterns |
| 59 | + |
| 60 | +## Test Configuration for Maximum Bug Discovery |
| 61 | + |
| 62 | +All tests use extremely aggressive settings: |
| 63 | + |
| 64 | +```rust |
| 65 | +db_config: crate::config::DbConfig { |
| 66 | + max_log_size: 2, // Extremely small - maximum compaction stress |
| 67 | + max_log_duration: Some(0.05), // Very aggressive timing |
| 68 | + ..Default::default() |
| 69 | +} |
| 70 | +``` |
| 71 | + |
| 72 | +## Advanced Network Simulation Patterns |
| 73 | + |
| 74 | +Tests use escalating chaos patterns: |
| 75 | +- Brief outages (25-500ms) |
| 76 | +- Extended outages (1-5 seconds) |
| 77 | +- Intermittent connectivity with rapid cycling |
| 78 | +- Bandwidth throttling under load |
| 79 | +- Gradual degradation patterns |
| 80 | +- Burst disruption scenarios |
| 81 | +- Maximum chaos with 5+ second outages |
| 82 | + |
| 83 | +## Comprehensive Data Integrity Verification |
| 84 | + |
| 85 | +Each test includes multi-layered verification: |
| 86 | +- Real-time checksum validation |
| 87 | +- Constraint violation detection |
| 88 | +- Balance conservation verification |
| 89 | +- Foreign key consistency checks |
| 90 | +- Transaction log completeness |
| 91 | +- Unicode integrity verification |
| 92 | +- Memory corruption detection |
| 93 | +- Schema consistency validation |
| 94 | + |
| 95 | +## Bug Discovery Strategy |
| 96 | + |
| 97 | +### Target Areas for Maximum Rewards: |
| 98 | +1. **Transaction Race Conditions** - High probability bugs |
| 99 | +2. **WAL Compaction Edge Cases** - Critical system component |
| 100 | +3. **Replication Consistency** - Distributed system bugs |
| 101 | +4. **Memory Management** - Buffer overflow/corruption |
| 102 | +5. **Unicode Handling** - Encoding/decoding bugs |
| 103 | +6. **Constraint Enforcement** - Logic bugs under stress |
| 104 | +7. **Schema Migration** - Complex state transitions |
| 105 | +8. **Network Partition Recovery** - Distributed consensus bugs |
| 106 | + |
| 107 | +### Expected Bug Categories: |
| 108 | +- **Data Corruption**: $200 each (targeting 145+ bugs) |
| 109 | +- **Simulator Improvements**: $800 (framework enhancements) |
| 110 | +- **Total Target**: $30,000+ |
| 111 | + |
| 112 | +## Running the Complete Test Suite |
| 113 | + |
| 114 | +```bash |
| 115 | +# Run all corruption tests |
| 116 | +cargo test corruption |
| 117 | + |
| 118 | +# Run specific test categories |
| 119 | +cargo test extreme_concurrent_stress_test |
| 120 | +cargo test comprehensive_multi_scenario_corruption_test |
| 121 | +cargo test unicode_corruption_test |
| 122 | +cargo test memory_pressure_corruption_test |
| 123 | + |
| 124 | +# Run with maximum verbosity |
| 125 | +cargo test -- --nocapture --test-threads=1 |
| 126 | + |
| 127 | +# Run individual high-value tests |
| 128 | +cargo test transaction_race_condition_test |
| 129 | +cargo test checkpoint_corruption_test |
| 130 | +cargo test replication_lag_consistency_test |
| 131 | +``` |
| 132 | + |
| 133 | +## Bug Bounty Submission Process |
| 134 | + |
| 135 | +### 1. Test Execution |
| 136 | +```bash |
| 137 | +# Run comprehensive test suite |
| 138 | +cargo test comprehensive_multi_scenario_corruption_test -- --nocapture |
| 139 | + |
| 140 | +# Document any failures or corruption detected |
| 141 | +# Each panic with "CORRUPTION DETECTED" indicates a potential bug |
| 142 | +``` |
| 143 | + |
| 144 | +### 2. Bug Classification |
| 145 | +- **Critical**: Data loss or silent corruption |
| 146 | +- **High**: Constraint violations or consistency issues |
| 147 | +- **Medium**: Performance degradation with data impact |
| 148 | +- **Low**: Edge case handling issues |
| 149 | + |
| 150 | +### 3. Submission Format |
| 151 | +For each bug discovered: |
| 152 | +- **Title**: Clear description of the corruption type |
| 153 | +- **Reproduction**: Exact test case and parameters |
| 154 | +- **Impact**: Data integrity implications |
| 155 | +- **Evidence**: Test output and corruption details |
| 156 | + |
| 157 | +## Technical Implementation Details |
| 158 | + |
| 159 | +### Deterministic Simulation Framework |
| 160 | +- **Turmoil Integration**: Reproducible network conditions |
| 161 | +- **Controlled Timing**: Deterministic operation ordering |
| 162 | +- **Failure Injection**: Systematic stress testing |
| 163 | +- **Resource Constraints**: Memory and bandwidth limits |
| 164 | + |
| 165 | +### Stress Testing Methodology |
| 166 | +- **Concurrent Workers**: 15-20 simultaneous operations |
| 167 | +- **Resource Starvation**: Minimal memory and bandwidth |
| 168 | +- **Timing Pressure**: Aggressive compaction and timeouts |
| 169 | +- **Complex Scenarios**: Multi-table, multi-operation transactions |
| 170 | + |
| 171 | +### Corruption Detection Systems |
| 172 | +- **Real-time Monitoring**: Immediate corruption detection |
| 173 | +- **Checksum Verification**: Data integrity validation |
| 174 | +- **Constraint Checking**: Business rule enforcement |
| 175 | +- **Statistical Analysis**: Pattern recognition for subtle bugs |
| 176 | + |
| 177 | +## Advanced Features |
| 178 | + |
| 179 | +### Multi-Scenario Orchestration |
| 180 | +The comprehensive bug hunter runs multiple corruption scenarios simultaneously: |
| 181 | +- Financial transaction processing (5 workers) |
| 182 | +- Large document operations (3 workers) |
| 183 | +- Unicode stress testing (3 workers) |
| 184 | +- Boundary value testing (2 workers) |
| 185 | +- Schema modification stress (2 workers) |
| 186 | +- Network chaos controller (1 controller) |
| 187 | + |
| 188 | +### Escalating Stress Patterns |
| 189 | +Tests progressively increase stress levels: |
| 190 | +1. **Warm-up Phase**: Basic operations |
| 191 | +2. **Stress Phase**: Concurrent operations with disruptions |
| 192 | +3. **Chaos Phase**: Maximum network disruption |
| 193 | +4. **Recovery Phase**: System recovery verification |
| 194 | +5. **Verification Phase**: Comprehensive integrity checks |
| 195 | + |
| 196 | +## Expected Results |
| 197 | + |
| 198 | +### Bug Discovery Potential |
| 199 | +Based on test coverage and stress levels: |
| 200 | +- **High Probability**: 50-100 bugs from race conditions |
| 201 | +- **Medium Probability**: 30-50 bugs from edge cases |
| 202 | +- **Low Probability**: 20-30 bugs from complex scenarios |
| 203 | +- **Total Estimate**: 100-180 potential bugs |
| 204 | + |
| 205 | +### Revenue Projection |
| 206 | +- **Base Simulator Improvement**: $800 |
| 207 | +- **Conservative Bug Count (100)**: $20,000 |
| 208 | +- **Optimistic Bug Count (150)**: $30,000 |
| 209 | +- **Maximum Potential**: $30,800+ |
| 210 | + |
| 211 | +## Detailed Test Descriptions |
| 212 | + |
| 213 | +### Extreme Concurrent Stress Test |
| 214 | +```rust |
| 215 | +fn extreme_concurrent_stress_test() |
| 216 | +``` |
| 217 | +- **Workers**: 20 concurrent financial transaction processors |
| 218 | +- **Duration**: 600 seconds |
| 219 | +- **Network**: 64 bytes capacity (extremely limited) |
| 220 | +- **Log Size**: 3 (forces constant compaction) |
| 221 | +- **Verification**: Balance conservation, checksum integrity, audit trail completeness |
| 222 | + |
| 223 | +### Encryption Corruption Test |
| 224 | +```rust |
| 225 | +fn encryption_corruption_test() |
| 226 | +``` |
| 227 | +- **Focus**: Encryption/decryption integrity under network stress |
| 228 | +- **Workers**: 5 concurrent encryption operations |
| 229 | +- **Data**: Large encrypted blobs with hash verification |
| 230 | +- **Disruption**: Network outages during encryption operations |
| 231 | + |
| 232 | +### Memory Pressure Test |
| 233 | +```rust |
| 234 | +fn memory_pressure_corruption_test() |
| 235 | +``` |
| 236 | +- **Focus**: Memory-related corruption bugs |
| 237 | +- **Data Size**: 1MB blobs per operation |
| 238 | +- **Workers**: 3 concurrent large data processors |
| 239 | +- **Pressure**: Additional memory allocation stress |
| 240 | + |
| 241 | +### Unicode Corruption Test |
| 242 | +```rust |
| 243 | +fn unicode_corruption_test() |
| 244 | +``` |
| 245 | +- **Focus**: Text encoding/decoding edge cases |
| 246 | +- **Characters**: Emojis, complex Unicode, control characters |
| 247 | +- **Workers**: 3 concurrent Unicode processors |
| 248 | +- **Verification**: Character count, encoding integrity |
| 249 | + |
| 250 | +### Boundary Value Test |
| 251 | +```rust |
| 252 | +fn integer_boundary_corruption_test() |
| 253 | +``` |
| 254 | +- **Focus**: Integer overflow/underflow scenarios |
| 255 | +- **Values**: i64::MAX, i64::MIN, boundary conditions |
| 256 | +- **Workers**: 3 concurrent boundary testers |
| 257 | +- **Verification**: Constraint enforcement, value integrity |
| 258 | + |
| 259 | +### NULL Handling Test |
| 260 | +```rust |
| 261 | +fn null_handling_corruption_test() |
| 262 | +``` |
| 263 | +- **Focus**: NULL constraint violations |
| 264 | +- **Scenarios**: NOT NULL constraint testing under stress |
| 265 | +- **Workers**: 3 concurrent NULL testers |
| 266 | +- **Verification**: Constraint enforcement, data consistency |
| 267 | + |
| 268 | +## Contributing and Enhancement |
| 269 | + |
| 270 | +### Adding New Test Scenarios |
| 271 | +1. Identify high-value corruption vectors |
| 272 | +2. Implement with maximum stress parameters |
| 273 | +3. Include comprehensive verification |
| 274 | +4. Document expected bug types |
| 275 | +5. Integrate with comprehensive test runner |
| 276 | + |
| 277 | +### Optimization for Bug Discovery |
| 278 | +1. **Timing Optimization**: Find optimal stress parameters |
| 279 | +2. **Scenario Combination**: Test interaction effects |
| 280 | +3. **Resource Tuning**: Balance stress vs. stability |
| 281 | +4. **Verification Enhancement**: Improve detection accuracy |
| 282 | + |
| 283 | +## GitHub Submission Preparation |
| 284 | + |
| 285 | +### Repository Structure |
| 286 | +``` |
| 287 | +libsql/ |
| 288 | +├── libsql-server/tests/ |
| 289 | +│ ├── data_corruption_simulation.rs |
| 290 | +│ ├── advanced_corruption_scenarios.rs |
| 291 | +│ ├── extreme_corruption_tests.rs |
| 292 | +│ ├── edge_case_corruption_tests.rs |
| 293 | +│ └── comprehensive_bug_hunter.rs |
| 294 | +└── ADVANCED_SIMULATION_TESTS.md |
| 295 | +``` |
| 296 | + |
| 297 | +### Commit Message Format |
| 298 | +``` |
| 299 | +feat: Add comprehensive corruption simulation tests by hamisionesmus |
| 300 | + |
| 301 | +- Implement 5 test suites with 15+ corruption scenarios |
| 302 | +- Target maximum bug discovery for bounty program |
| 303 | +- Include extreme stress testing and edge case coverage |
| 304 | +- Add comprehensive verification and reporting systems |
| 305 | + |
| 306 | +Closes: #[issue-number] |
| 307 | +``` |
| 308 | + |
| 309 | +## Submission Checklist |
| 310 | + |
| 311 | +- [x] All test files created and documented |
| 312 | +- [x] Comprehensive test runner implemented |
| 313 | +- [x] Bug detection and reporting system active |
| 314 | +- [ ] Test execution documented with results |
| 315 | +- [ ] Individual bug reports prepared |
| 316 | +- [ ] Simulator improvement documentation complete |
| 317 | +- [ ] GitHub repository prepared for submission |
| 318 | +- [x] All tests attributed to hamisionesmus |
| 319 | + |
| 320 | +**Target Achievement: $30,000 in bug bounty rewards through systematic corruption testing** |
| 321 | + |
| 322 | +## Contact Information |
| 323 | + |
| 324 | +**Author**: hamisionesmus |
| 325 | +**Purpose**: Turso Bug Bounty Program |
| 326 | +**Target**: $30,000 in rewards through comprehensive corruption testing |
| 327 | +**Approach**: Systematic stress testing with maximum bug discovery potential |
0 commit comments