Unicode behaviour different between Erlang and Erjang

[oubiwann]

In Erlang, Unicode presentation looks like this:

io:format([8482]).
™ok

In Erjang:

> io:format([8482]).
\x{2122}ok

[rvirding]

What does LFE print?

[oubiwann]

Plain (non-Erjang) LFE has the following behaviour when started with both +pc latin1 and +pc unicode:

(io:format (list 8482))
™ok

[oubiwann]

In a related note, @rvirding may have found the source of the Java string output rendering problem (ticket #84): not handing Unicode in the LFE pretty printer code... we're still examining this, though.

[oubiwann]

Hrm, another oddity: io_lib:format on LFE+Erjang doesn't seem to return anything...

In Erlang:

> io_lib:format("~ts", [unicode:characters_to_binary([8432])]).
[[8432]]

In Erjang:

1> io_lib:format("~ts", [unicode:characters_to_binary(List2)]).
[[8432]]

In plain LFE:

> (io_lib:format '"~ts" (list (unicode:characters_to_binary '(8482))))
((8482))
>

In LFE on Erjang:

> (io_lib:format '"~ts" (list (unicode:characters_to_binary '(8482))))
>