Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 28, 2022. It is now read-only.

Add support for Ember FastBoot #122

Open
wcurtis opened this issue Jan 22, 2016 · 7 comments
Open

Add support for Ember FastBoot #122

wcurtis opened this issue Jan 22, 2016 · 7 comments

Comments

@wcurtis
Copy link
Contributor

wcurtis commented Jan 22, 2016

Ember FastBoot is still super beta, but wanted to get the conversation started about what it might take to add FastBoot support to this buildpack. Has anyone played around with FastBoot on Heroku? Beanstalk seems like the go-to deploy method right now.

Figured it's worth a convo after this (promising) update from the Ember 2.3 blog post:

Importantly, the addition of this API means FastBoot is now usable with Ember.js 2.3 stable. FastBoot itself remains experimental, however this is the first time you can use it with a release build of Ember.js. The README.md for ember-cli-fastboot is the best place to start if you want to try FastBoot.

@tonycoco
Copy link
Owner

Sounds like a good idea to me. Anyone want to investigate?

@wcurtis
Copy link
Contributor Author

wcurtis commented Jan 28, 2016

I likely won't get a chance for another few months - but if no-one's on it by then I'll definitely post progress.

@nahtnam
Copy link

nahtnam commented Jul 4, 2016

Any update? Would love to see this happen!

@Dhaulagiri
Copy link
Contributor

@nahtnam fwiw there is another buildpack that provides this functionality out of the box here

@RobbieTheWagner
Copy link

Has anyone taken a stab at this? I'm having issues with the official heroku buildpack and would love to give this one a try, but I need Fastboot.

@RobbieTheWagner
Copy link

@tonycoco @wcurtis have either of you guys dug into this at all? Would really love to see this happen! I would be glad to attempt to help out, but don't know much about buildpacks.

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Nov 1, 2016

+1

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants