Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jun 17, 2022. It is now read-only.

Merging into a bigger script collection #4

Open
orschiro opened this issue Feb 16, 2014 · 2 comments
Open

Merging into a bigger script collection #4

orschiro opened this issue Feb 16, 2014 · 2 comments

Comments

@orschiro
Copy link

Hi there,

Thanks for your efforts to collecting various useful dmenu scripts!

A few weeks ago I had a similar idea, not knowing about your repo at that time.

https://github.com/orschiro/dmenu-scripts-collection

What do you think about merging both efforts and maintaining just one collection repo?

For further scripts to add to such a repo we can also have a look to the newly created subreddit /dmenu:

http://www.reddit.com/r/dmenu/search?q=dmenu&sort=relevance&restrict_sr=on&t=all

Tell me what you think!

@tlvince
Copy link
Owner

tlvince commented Feb 16, 2014

This repo doesn't attempt to provide an index of scripts. However, there's certainly value in one, but perhaps it's better suited as a wiki?

Although many of the scripts in dmenu-tools were inspired by those found in the wild (mainly the Arch Linux forums), all have been (re)written very much in-line with the "suckless philosophy", i.e. they are concise, portable (e.g. target pure POSIX shells rather than making use of bash-ism (say)) and try to do as little as possible.

I don't use dmenu currently, but would happily accept contributions that follow the same style.

@orschiro
Copy link
Author

This repo doesn't attempt to provide an index of scripts. However, there's certainly value in one, but perhaps it's better suited as a wiki?

I think your doc folder is already sufficient. Additionally we could provide an overview of all scripts available in README.md.

So if I understand you correctly, then I could merge my collection into yours by adding the scripts to src and the readmes to doc. Anything else I have to take care of?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants