Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fct_na_value_to_level() adds a level for NA value even if it is not need #347

Open
LukaszDerylo opened this issue Feb 24, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement

Comments

@LukaszDerylo
Copy link

Imagine a factor without NAs on which you call fct_na_value_to_level().

Formely, fct_explicit_na() did absolutely nothing in such case:

letters[1:3] %>% factor %>% fct_explicit_na('x')
[1] a b c
Levels: a b c

Now, fct_na_value_to_level() adds a level for NA value even if it is not need:

letters[1:3] %>% factor %>% fct_na_value_to_level('x')
[1] a b c
Levels: a b c x

So, simple replacement (fct_na_value_to_level for fct_explicit_na) breaks existing code sometimes.

Ideally, fct_na_value_to_level() could behave just like fct_explicit_na() did. Or, at least warning message should inform somehow about above case.

@hadley
Copy link
Member

hadley commented Feb 27, 2023

Reprex

library(forcats)
letters[1:3] %>% factor %>% fct_na_value_to_level('x')
#> [1] a b c
#> Levels: a b c x

Created on 2023-02-27 with reprex v2.0.2

@hadley hadley added the feature a feature request or enhancement label Oct 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants