-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Document and/or improve having virtualbox as a provider choice #836
Comments
We don't set this in boxes. It's part of core vagrant and thus documented there: https://www.vagrantup.com/docs/providers/basic_usage.html#default-provider |
Thanks! I'll make small doc PR to note that (I see it is noted in the following libvirt section). |
Working through trying to get forklift to provision properly and would welcome assistance. If there is a better forum to interact (discourse or IRC), please let me know. A hand-crafted Vagrantfile has this:
This works, though the IP is not the one specified but seemingly the next one in order of availability(?). The equivalent 99-local.yaml has this:
which generates an error on vagrant up vbtmp --provider virtualbox:
If there is anyone that can assist, please let me know. Thanks! |
Adding 'devel' to the box name got past the above error (as it was actually trying to override port 80 again). The working configuration:
or to actually set the ip address
|
I see some docs[1] and other references to virtualbox in this repo but am not sure how to set the provider in my boxes.yaml file. I'm hoping it's a simple config per-box and I'll PR to update the docs.
Pinging @bastilian @ehelms - Any pointers or examples?
[1] https://github.com/theforeman/forklift/blob/8b95b1a2d9cb78e2675025400b748344d23e14ea/docs/production.md#using-virtualbox-windows-os-x
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: