Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

consider repository restructuring and build system #296

Open
sgratzl opened this issue May 20, 2020 · 0 comments
Open

consider repository restructuring and build system #296

sgratzl opened this issue May 20, 2020 · 0 comments

Comments

@sgratzl
Copy link
Contributor

sgratzl commented May 20, 2020

one could restructure the repo in the following way for better structure and readability

/dist
  cola.umd.js ... umd js build
  cola.esm.js ... esm build
  cola.umd.min.js ... umd minified js build
/src ... moved from WebCola/src
/test ... moved form WebCola/test
/website ... moved form WebCola

build system wise, one could

  • move from travis to github actions
  • move from phantom-js custom implementation to cypress integration tests
  • move from grunt to rollup/webpack for better bundling or use a wrapper like tsdx or microbundle
  • move from qunit to jest
  • use a service like netlify.com to build and host the website. Alternatively use a github action to build the website and push it back into the gh-pages branch
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant