-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 34
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Allow asset participation in governance to be configurable #50
Comments
An alternative solution is to make sure that the alliance module votes This solution loses the ability to allow individual alliances to be configured with governance and also might potentially allow all proposal to pass quorum even when there are low voter participation. |
Should we configure this module in a fork version or directly add a gov module into x folder? |
@phamminh0811 the module can be created inside the /custom folder from alliance module, similar to the bank module implementation and it can be merged into the main branch |
great, I'm working on that |
Not all assets should be allowed to participate in governance as there might be conflict of interests in some cases.
x/gov
)Tally
method with a modified implementation that checks if assets should be part of the voting power calculation.x/gov
moduleThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: