Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Why does this proposal belong in 262, but not the rest of Underscore/Lodash? #16

Open
sffc opened this issue Sep 1, 2020 · 1 comment
Open

Why does this proposal belong in 262, but not the rest of Underscore/Lodash? #16

sffc opened this issue Sep 1, 2020 · 1 comment
Labels
question Further information is requested

Comments

@sffc
Copy link

sffc commented Sep 1, 2020 •
edited
Loading

This proposal is basically taking one of the convenience methods from popular JS helper libraries like Underscore.js and Lodash and putting it into 262.

Why uniqueBy? Why not zip, chunk, or any of the other convenience methods not yet covered?
@ljharb
Copy link
Member

ljharb commented Sep 1, 2020

Userland is where many of the array methods came from - I think the automatic answer is "probably all of them should be included, but in independent proposals"?

@TechQuery TechQuery added the question Further information is requested label Sep 10, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
question Further information is requested
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ljharb @sffc @TechQuery