Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Compilation of folly and dwarfs taking too long #59

Open
ronaldtse opened this issue Dec 18, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

Compilation of folly and dwarfs taking too long #59

ronaldtse opened this issue Dec 18, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor

Can we use a precompiled libfolly and we can precompile a libdwarfs for distribution / bundling use?

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor Author

The current mechanism of using CMake to clone all the dependencies is cumbersome. It makes the whole build more fragile to re-runs (takes a long time to download, compile, etc), and difficult to test changes (because it takes a long time).

@ronaldtse
Copy link
Contributor Author

Maybe keeping dynamic libraries inside the MemFS, and then using those would work better for dependency management?

@maxirmx
Copy link
Member

maxirmx commented Dec 20, 2021

Maybe keeping dynamic libraries inside the MemFS, and then using those would work better for dependency management?

Dynamic libraries are required to start tebako package that are supposed to contain dynamic libraries inside it.

@maxirmx
Copy link
Member

maxirmx commented Feb 10, 2022

tamatebako/libdwarfs#76

@maxirmx
Copy link
Member

maxirmx commented Jul 26, 2023

Now when tebako is packaged as a ruby gem we can mimic dwarfs/folly libraries as native extensions

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 📋 Backlog
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants