From cd8c7644685c97010a8ee524560df059a7e06725 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Richard Werkman <richard.werkman@infosupport.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2024 20:18:12 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Use concurrentbag instead of list

---
 .../Stryker.Core/Initialisation/ProjectOrchestrator.cs         | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/src/Stryker.Core/Stryker.Core/Initialisation/ProjectOrchestrator.cs b/src/Stryker.Core/Stryker.Core/Initialisation/ProjectOrchestrator.cs
index 06c1ccc809..e01fd60e65 100644
--- a/src/Stryker.Core/Stryker.Core/Initialisation/ProjectOrchestrator.cs
+++ b/src/Stryker.Core/Stryker.Core/Initialisation/ProjectOrchestrator.cs
@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
 using System;
+using System.Collections.Concurrent;
 using System.Collections.Generic;
 using System.IO;
 using System.Linq;
@@ -64,7 +65,7 @@ public IEnumerable<IMutationTestProcess> MutateProjects(StrykerOptions options,
             InitializeDashboardProjectInformation(options, projectInfos.First());
             var inputs = _initializationProcess.GetMutationTestInputs(options, projectInfos, _runner);
 
-            var mutationTestProcesses = new List<IMutationTestProcess>();
+            var mutationTestProcesses = new ConcurrentBag<IMutationTestProcess>();
             Parallel.ForEach(inputs, mutationTestInput =>
             {
                 mutationTestProcesses.Add(_projectMutator.MutateProject(options, mutationTestInput, reporters));