Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Security Vulnerabilities #481

Open
Lewiscowles1986 opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 4 comments
Open

Security Vulnerabilities #481

Lewiscowles1986 opened this issue Mar 20, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@Lewiscowles1986
Copy link

According to AWS ECR these vulnerabilities are present within the :latest tag you are directing users to download

Details of Vulnerabilities
CVE Component Severity
CVE-2016-6301 busybox:1.24.1-r7 HIGH
CVE-2016-8859 musl:1.1.12-r5 HIGH
CVE-2016-6304 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 HIGH
CVE-2016-2182 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 HIGH
CVE-2016-6303 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 HIGH
CVE-2016-9843 zlib:1.2.8-r2 HIGH
CVE-2016-9841 zlib:1.2.8-r2 HIGH
CVE-2017-15873 busybox:1.24.1-r7 MEDIUM
CVE-2017-16544 busybox:1.24.1-r7 MEDIUM
CVE-2017-15650 musl:1.1.12-r5 MEDIUM
CVE-2017-3736 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 MEDIUM
CVE-2016-2183 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 MEDIUM
CVE-2016-6302 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 MEDIUM
CVE-2016-2181 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 MEDIUM
CVE-2016-6306 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 MEDIUM
CVE-2016-2179 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 MEDIUM
CVE-2017-3731 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 MEDIUM
CVE-2017-3732 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 MEDIUM
CVE-2016-2180 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 MEDIUM
CVE-2017-3735 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 MEDIUM
CVE-2016-7052 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 MEDIUM
CVE-2016-9840 zlib:1.2.8-r2 MEDIUM
CVE-2016-9842 zlib:1.2.8-r2 MEDIUM
CVE-2016-7055 openssl:1.0.2h-r1 LOW
@hbrunn
Copy link

hbrunn commented Apr 7, 2020

I think it's safe to assume that this project is unsupported, and everyone should look for alternatives, like the nextcloud addon by the same developers or their commercial solution.

For the record I feel okay by now running this docker file until our alternative is as stable as this:

FROM ubuntu:16.04

RUN apt-get update &&\
apt-get install -y software-properties-common &&\
apt-add-repository ppa:strukturag/spreed-webrtc-unstable &&\
apt-get update &&\
apt-get install -y spreed-webrtc &&\
sed -i /etc/spreed/webrtc.conf -e 's/^\(listen = \).*/\1:8080/' &&\
sed -i /etc/spreed/webrtc.conf -e 's/^\(sessionSecret = \).*/\1secret/' &&\
sed -i /etc/spreed/webrtc.conf -e 's/^\(encryptionSecret = \).*/\1secret/' &&\
sed -i /etc/spreed/webrtc.conf -e 's/^\(serverToken = \).*/\1secret/' &&\
sed -i /etc/spreed/webrtc.conf -e 's/^;\(title = \).*/\1title/' &&\
sed -i /etc/spreed/webrtc.conf -e 's/^;\(turnURIs = \).*/\1turn:host:port?transport=udp turn:host:port?transport=tcp/' &&\
sed -i /etc/spreed/webrtc.conf -e 's/^;\(turnSecret = \).*/\1secret/'

CMD spreed-webrtc-server

but of course I suffer a lot of sweat when rebuilding this and hoping that no update breaks the software.

@Lewiscowles1986
Copy link
Author

Interesting. I took a different approach running the rebuild here and publishing on 18.04 to make all the notices go away. I feel like the issue should live as it's not fixed though. There is a wontfix label which perfectly describes the situation as an unresolved issue, which can explicitly signal to users the state.

@hbrunn
Copy link

hbrunn commented Apr 7, 2020

and none of us has the permission to set that, so I think this point is quite moot.

@Tokarak
Copy link

Tokarak commented Aug 17, 2022

I was looking for alternatives, and I think this may be the best:
holtwick/briefing which also has a public instance at https://brie.fi/ng.
The plusses are a good UI and good encryption; all the components are lightweight and can easily be self-hosted; there are native mobile clients, too. The negatives: the developer is under-funded and unmotivated; no client-side configuration that I can see; the connection to the signalling server isn't quite E2EE; it took me ages to find the documentation (in the Github wiki).

I found it using alternativeto.net.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants