We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
We should measure the impact of activating Rust integer overflow checks as per https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/profiles.html#overflow-checks. This can be activated through a config change in https://github.com/stacks-network/sbtc/blob/main/Cargo.toml.
It's recommended to activate this if the resulting performance tradeoff can be accepted.
Note: We should ensure this will cover WSTS as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Oh I thought that it panicked by default, but it appears that it wraps by default. Yeah we should do this.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
Feature - Consider activating Rust integer overflow protection
1. Description
We should measure the impact of activating Rust integer overflow checks as per https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/profiles.html#overflow-checks. This can be activated through a config change in https://github.com/stacks-network/sbtc/blob/main/Cargo.toml.
It's recommended to activate this if the resulting performance tradeoff can be accepted.
Note: We should ensure this will cover WSTS as well.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: