-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 200
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Markdown table support #2857
Comments
Right, I'm still moderately against Markdown tables. They don't actually save you any meaningful typing over just using HTML with omitted end tags, and they're (by a significant margin) more complex to parse than any other block. The main reason they're used is because many Markdown processors just don't support HTML, or don't support mixing it with Markdown well; Bikeshed very intentionally supports mixing the two syntaxes well.
Right, that's because "Markdown tables" aren't Markdown - they're just a common extension. The docs are clear that I support CommonMark with some documented exceptions and additions. Parsing is... ill-defined, generally, for tables. For example, the first table in the page you link is making some interesting assumptions about how the table syntax parses. Instead, it could be written:
|
Where is bikeshed on markdown table support? I'm investigating the possibilities of how I can best port the AV1 specification to bikeshed.
Take a look at this file for example 06.bitstream.syntax.md. Basically, every single syntax element is defined in a table, and I want to avoid writing HTML for each table.
I see there was a quite extensive discussion in #1128 on this topic and it seems like there was no agreement on adding this. Is this still the case? If yes, what would be the best way forward for me?
PS: Also it would be good to document that the markdown tables are not supported. At least I could not find anything about it in the documentation.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: