We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
I downloaded the pretrained Imagenet 64 checkpoint and use the provided sampling commands (with slight modification to make it run on my machine)
export OMPI_COMM_WORLD_RANK=0 export OMPI_COMM_WORLD_LOCAL_RANK=0 export OMPI_COMM_WORLD_SIZE=8 MODEL_FLAGS="--data_name=imagenet64 --class_cond=True --eval_interval=1000 --save_interval=1000 --num_classes=1000 --eval_batch=250 --eval_fid=True --eval_similarity=False --check_dm_performance=False --log_interval=100" # CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 mpiexec -n 1 python ./code/image_sample.py $MODEL_FLAGS --class_cond=True --num_classes=1000 --out_dir ./ctm-sample-paths/ctm_bs_1440/ --model_path=./ctm-runs/ctm_bs_1440/ema_0.999_006000.pt --training_mode=ctm --class_cond=True --eval_num_samples=6400 --batch_size=800 --device_id=0 --stochastic_seed=True --save_format=npz --ind_1=36 --ind_2=20 --use_MPI=True --sampler=exact --sampling_steps=1 CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 mpiexec -n 1 python ./code/image_sample.py $MODEL_FLAGS --class_cond=True --num_classes=1000 --out_dir ./ctm-sample-paths/ctm_bs_1440_author/ --model_path=./ckpts/ema_0.999_049000.pt --training_mode=ctm --class_cond=True --eval_num_samples=6400 --batch_size=800 --device_id=0 --stochastic_seed=True --save_format=npz --ind_1=36 --ind_2=20 --use_MPI=True --sampler=exact --sampling_steps=1
And I tested it according to the provided instrutions.
CUDA_VISIBLE_DEVICES=0 python code/evaluations/evaluator.py ref-statistics/VIRTUAL_imagenet64_labeled.npz ctm-sample-paths/ctm_bs_1440_author/ctm_exact_sampler_1_steps_049000_itrs_0.999_ema_/
But the performance reading is significantly worse.
Inception Score: 68.49456024169922FID: 6.839029518808786 sFID: 22.465793478419187 Precision: 0.7965625 Recall: 0.6551
How exactly could I read FID 1.92 ? Even with pretrained model directly from the author?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
No branches or pull requests
I downloaded the pretrained Imagenet 64 checkpoint and use the provided sampling commands (with slight modification to make it run on my machine)
And I tested it according to the provided instrutions.
But the performance reading is significantly worse.
How exactly could I read FID 1.92 ? Even with pretrained model directly from the author?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: