You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
14_First_11_21_S2_bin.16_6644_ef2cc1_CJIKHDKB_00326 30313 species Clostridium AM magnum Bacteria;Bacillota A;Clostridia;Clostridiales;Clostridiaceae;Clostridium AM;Clostridium AM magnum;uc_Clostridium AM magnum
If I repeat the same with mmseqs search I get following hits:
From the mmseqs search output one can see that the top hit (NZ_JH601103.1), has the best target, query coverage and evalue.
The top hit belongs to the organism Dolosigranulum pigrumhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_JH601103 which has the following taxonomy:
Hi all,
if I run the following
mmseqs taxonomy
command I get for my protein sequence theClostridium AM magnum
hit.test.taxonomy.tsv output:
If I repeat the same with
mmseqs search
I get following hits:mmseqs.out.tsv output:
From the
mmseqs search
output one can see that the top hit (NZ_JH601103.1), has the best target, query coverage and evalue.The top hit belongs to the organism
Dolosigranulum pigrum
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/NZ_JH601103 which has the following taxonomy:d__Bacteria; p__Bacillota; c__Bacilli; o__Lactobacillales; f__Carnobacteriaceae; g__Dolosigranulum; s__Dolosigranulum pigrum
I wonder how this discrepancy between the taxonomy of the
mmseqs search
top hit and the taxonomy provided bymmseqs taxonomy
can happen?Steps to Reproduce (for bugs)
The gtdb database I used, can be downloaded here
The test sequence can be found here
Your Environment
Include as many relevant details about the environment you experienced the bug in.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: