Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Critical Cases Flag/Status #41

Open
SpeckiJ opened this issue Nov 14, 2017 · 1 comment
Open

Critical Cases Flag/Status #41

SpeckiJ opened this issue Nov 14, 2017 · 1 comment

Comments

@SpeckiJ
Copy link
Collaborator

SpeckiJ commented Nov 14, 2017

A Reviewer should be able to set a "critical" flag on a document after it has been approved/rejected.

This state marks studies which have been critical and can serve as examples for future reference.

This could be implemented with additional states that can be accessed after documents reached state 6 or 7. The documents should still be accessible in the normal lists and have their own filter group.

@nicho90
Copy link
Contributor

nicho90 commented Nov 14, 2017

A temporary solution could be to take a note during the review process. In this case, it is already possible to find this document very easy by using the search bar. For better results, the reviewers could agree on a special keyword (e.g. CRITICAL) for tagging it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants