You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A Reviewer should be able to set a "critical" flag on a document after it has been approved/rejected.
This state marks studies which have been critical and can serve as examples for future reference.
This could be implemented with additional states that can be accessed after documents reached state 6 or 7. The documents should still be accessible in the normal lists and have their own filter group.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
A temporary solution could be to take a note during the review process. In this case, it is already possible to find this document very easy by using the search bar. For better results, the reviewers could agree on a special keyword (e.g. CRITICAL) for tagging it.
A Reviewer should be able to set a "critical" flag on a document after it has been approved/rejected.
This state marks studies which have been critical and can serve as examples for future reference.
This could be implemented with additional states that can be accessed after documents reached state 6 or 7. The documents should still be accessible in the normal lists and have their own filter group.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: