Ingesting LOGs questions #541
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 4 comments 5 replies
-
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
Could you clarify the motivation for this request in more detail? I cannot understand the reasoning other than the cosmetic parts. HEP logs are nice because they're simple and almost any HEP enabled system can generate them easily. The content of HEP type 100 is always a char string but the API can detect and parse the content as JSON when required and only on-demand. And as you know, the only association is the The JSON content of HEP 100 is not meant to be parsed and is not designed to feed the data_header which is controlled by the agent. I doubt you can achieve your goals with HEP logs. On the other hand, the upcoming version of HOMER is entirely based on our stack qryn, which has dedicated and sophisticated support for logs, metrics and traces alongside the packets. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
When JSON objects don't have a schema, data cannot be promoted to display fields since it might not exist. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
also, just one more question about timestamps: |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
@alex-replicant Homer knows how to sort and yes, you could hack the mapping to pick a different time header possibly , but ultimately the correct timestamp should be set by the agent. There's no other way so please do this in the extraction of heppipe.js or if you prefer using pastash and its transformers to customize the hep packets.