Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Show images that are present in the docker but not yet present in the database: image availability #504

Open
stefanoborini opened this issue Jun 5, 2017 · 2 comments

Comments

@stefanoborini
Copy link
Contributor

If we have some images in docker, we should display them in the application list of the admin anyway, and mark them as disabled. If an image is not in the database it should be considered as such.

If the image is in the database, it will have an additional boolean column for when it's enabled.
Only enabled images will be runnable by the users.

Only images that are fully supported will be shown. You can use the application type label to distinguish which ones are valid simphony-remote images.

@stefanoborini
Copy link
Contributor Author

you have four classes of images:

  1. images that are NOT part of simphony-remote
  2. images that are part of simphony-remote but are NOT in the db.
  3. images that are part of simphony-remote but are in the db, and are disabled
  4. images that are part of simphony-remote but are in the db, and are enabled.

You don't want to show 1.
you want to show 2, but mark them as disabled.
you want to show 3 and 4, and are enabled or disabled accordingly.

Distinguish 1 via the application type.

@martinRenou
Copy link
Member

In the new application dialog it would be great to have a combo-box with available images on docker instead of typing the image name. This means having a backend which supports docker related requests.

@stefanoborini stefanoborini modified the milestone: 2.1.0 Jul 6, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants