-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 644
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
1N34 (germanium diode) incorrectly simulated? #949
Comments
I don't notice any glaring issues with the two Shottkey diodes, which are also low-threshold diodes and match my limited understanding. But the 1N34 seems way off...maybe it should just be deleted from that menu if fixing its simulation is too hard. |
Have you seen this: https://forum.allaboutcircuits.com/threads/error-in-1n34-spice-model.48758/ I tried it with MacSpice and got exactly the same results. I guess the model is just bad. Deleting it from the menu seems like a good idea.
|
Ahh. Yeah...just delete it for now. |
Try this simulation of a 1N34. When inputting voltage from 0 to 500 mV, the current only reaches 1.363 micro amps:
But germanium diodes are typically said to have a rough threshold around 300 mV, and all datasheets and plots of 1N34 diodes I can find on the internet show the current should be well into the milli amp range by the time its voltage is 500 mV, for instance:
I looked at
circuitjs1/src/com/lushprojects/circuitjs1/client/DiodeModel.java
Line 90 in dd47cf4
Thanks as always for such a great tool.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: