-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 58
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fail message referes to a Feature that doesn't have the Refine property. #345
Comments
I am using
Trying to unfold a simple structure.. but it is failing. Actually this is the first time I am doing this, so I am not sure if I am doing this right. I am selecting a face and trying to unfold the structure. The structure is simple, I guess. And I am also seeing this issue here:
|
There is also a different issue when I apply Part Design Features. I am not sure if it supports that.
For instance, I tried to make a groove in the last feature to create some room inside. |
the refine is a general preference in part design. |
The first folder has the one that fails for some unknown reason. This was my first attempt, and things broke during the process and I had to fix some features after some updates adding extra faces and this may be related to the issue. I am about to redo this to check if I can improve it. I was doing features on one side, and after I realized that I could select more than 1 face at the same time so I don't have to mirror anything at the end. The second folder has another similar test. To see if a new object could work without issues. And it worked fine including the Pocket. The 3rd folder is another test, where I am using a Grove as in the 1st test, and it works, but the projected Sketch is not as good as in the second test. |
The popup suggested to turn off refine on Bend02. Ah, I understand now that the suggestion was to disable the refine somewhere until the Bend02 feature since Bend02 does not have that property. |
Replicated the design without the groove, and it works. Also, I could not set the tip of the Body with the Sheetmetal, to ignore the Part Design Feature, I had to delete it. Is it possible to do that somehow? This way I could test intermediate places to check if the sheet metal is working. |
Few things about the original design:
|
Good. I don't remember setting something with radius zero. At least least this was not my intention. About the groove, am I doing something wrong or is there any design trick that I can to do avoid confusing the unfoder that much? |
There is no right or wrong when cutting features into a sheetmetal object. Its just a limitation of the unfolder (the unfold algorithm is very complex and was done by a very clever programmer - not me) |
Thanks for the explanation. I was experimenting this workbench to design a cardboard structure to fix items inside a cardboard box. |
Hard to follow due to multiple issues reported. What is relevant here? |
The issue is that a bad message appears when something doesn't work. The message referes to a Metal sheet feature that doesn't have the property "Refine". That message should be improved. |
Where is this Refine property, I could not find it. Is this generic advice or this feature should have this property and I am not finding it?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: