Skip to content

Latest commit

 

History

History
538 lines (432 loc) · 23.6 KB

snapshot-support.md

File metadata and controls

538 lines (432 loc) · 23.6 KB
Raw

Firecracker Snapshotting

Table of Contents

About microVM snapshotting

MicroVM snapshotting is a mechanism through which a running microVM and its resources can be serialized and saved to an external medium in the form of a snapshot. This snapshot can be later used to restore a microVM with its guest workload at that particular point in time.

Snapshotting in Firecracker

Supported platforms

The Firecracker snapshot feature is in developer preview on all CPU micro-architectures listed in README.

Overview

A Firecracker microVM snapshot can be used for loading it later in a different Firecracker process, and the original guest workload is being simply resumed.

The original guest which the snapshot is created from, should see no side effects from this process (other than the latency introduced by the snapshot creation process).

Both network and vsock packet loss can be expected on guests that are resumed from snapshots in another Firecracker process. It is also not guaranteed that the state of the network connections survives the process.

In order to make restoring possible, Firecracker snapshots save the full state of the following resources:

  • the guest memory,
  • the emulated HW state (both KVM and Firecracker emulated HW).

The state of the components listed above is generated independently, which brings flexibility to our snapshotting support. This means that taking a snapshot results in multiple files that are composing the full microVM snapshot:

  • the guest memory file,
  • the microVM state file,
  • zero or more disk files (depending on how many the guest had; these are managed by the users).

The design allows sharing of memory pages and read only disks between multiple microVMs. When loading a snapshot, instead of loading at resume time the full contents from file to memory, Firecracker creates a MAP_PRIVATE mapping of the memory file, resulting in runtime on-demand loading of memory pages. Any subsequent memory writes go to a copy-on-write anonymous memory mapping. This has the advantage of very fast snapshot loading times, but comes with the cost of having to keep the guest memory file around for the entire lifetime of the resumed microVM.

Snapshot files management

The Firecracker snapshot design offers a very simple interface to interact with snapshots but provides no functionality to package or manage them on the host. Using snapshots in production is currently not recommended as there are open Known issues and limitations.

The threat containment model states that the host, host/API communication and snapshot files are trusted by Firecracker.

To ensure a secure integration with the snapshot functionality, users need to secure snapshot files by implementing authentication and encryption schemes while managing their lifecycle or moving them across the trust boundary, like for example when provisioning them from a respository to a host over the network.

Firecracker is optimized for fast load/resume and it's designed to do some very basic sanity checks only on the vm state file. It only verifies integrity using a 64 bit CRC value embedded in the vm state file, but this is only as a partial measure to protect against accidental corruption, as the disk files and memory file need to be secured as well. It is important to note that CRC computation is validated before trying to load the snapshot. Should it encounter failure, an error will be shown to the user and the Firecracker process will be terminated.

Performance

The Firecracker snapshot create/resume performance depends on the memory size, vCPU count and emulated devices count. The Firecracker CI runs snapshots tests on AWS m5d.metal instances for Intel and on AWS m6g.metal for ARM. The baseline for snapshot resume latency target on Intel is under 8ms with 5ms p90, and on ARM is under 3ms for a microVM with the following specs: 2vCPU/512MB/1 block/1 net device.

Known issues and limitations

  • High snapshot latency on 5.4+ host kernels - #2129
  • Guest network connectivity is not guaranteed to be preserved after resume. For recommendations related to guest network connectivity for clones please see Network connectivity for clones.
  • Vsock device does not have full snapshotting support. Please see Vsock device limitations.
  • Poor entropy and replayable randomness when resuming multiple microvms which deal with cryptographic secrets. Please see Snapshot security and uniqueness.

Firecracker Snapshotting characteristics

  • Fresh Firecracker microVMs are booted using anonymous memory, while microVMs resumed from snapshot load memory on-demand from the snapshot and copy-on-write to anonymous memory.
  • Resuming from a snapshot is optimized for speed, while taking a snapshot involves some extra CPU cycles for synchronously writing dirty memory pages to the memory snapshot file. Taking a snapshot of a fresh microVM, on which dirty pages tracking is not enabled, results in the full contents of guest memory being written to the snapshot.
  • The memory file and microVM state file are generated by Firecracker on snapshot creation. The disk contents are not explicitly flushed to their backing files.
  • The API calls exposing the snapshotting functionality have clear Prerequisites that describe the requirements on when/how they should be used.

Snapshot versioning

Firecracker snapshotting implementation offers support for microVM versioning (cross-version snapshots) in the following contexts:

  • saving snapshots at older versions (being able to create a snapshot with any version in the [N, N + o] interval, while being in Firecracker version N+o),
  • loading snapshots from older versions (being able to load a snapshot created by any Firecracker version in the [N, N + o] interval, in a Firecracker version N+o).

The design supports an unlimited number of versions, the value of o (maximum number of older versions that we can restore from / save a snapshot to, from the current version) will be defined later.

Snapshot API

Firecracker exposes the following APIs for manipulating snapshots: Pause, Resume and CreateSnapshot can be called only after booting the microVM, while LoadSnapshot is allowed only before boot.

Pausing the microVM

To create a snapshot, first you have to pause the running microVM and its vCPUs with the following API command:

curl --unix-socket /tmp/firecracker.socket -i \
    -X PATCH 'http://localhost/vm' \
    -H 'Accept: application/json' \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{
            "state": "Paused"
    }'

Prerequisites: The microVM is booted. Successive calls of this request keep the microVM in the Paused state. Effects:

  • on success: microVM is guaranteed to be Paused.
  • on failure: no side-effects.

Creating snapshots

Now that the microVM is paused, you can create a snapshot, which can be either a fullone or a diff one. Full snapshots always create a complete, resume-able snapshot of the current microVM state and memory. Diff snapshots save the current microVM state and the memory dirtied since the last snapshot (full or diff). Diff snapshots are not resume-able, but can be merged into a full snapshot. In this context, we will refer to the base as the first memory file created by a /snapshot/create API call and the layer as a memory file created by a subsequent /snapshot/create API call. The order in which the snapshots were created matters and they should be merged in the same order in which they were created. To merge a diff snapshot memory file on top of a base, users should copy its content over the base, as the following example does:

dd bs=4096 if=path/to/layer of=path/to/base conv=sparse,notrunc

After executing the command above, the base would be a resumable snapshot memory file describing the state of the memory at the moment of creation of the layer. More layers which were created later can be merged on top of this base.

This process needs to be repeated for each layer until the one describing the desired memory state is merged on top of the base, which is constantly updated with information from previously merged layers. Please note that users should not merge state files which resulted from /snapshot/create API calls and they should use the state file created in the same call as the memory file which was merged last on top of the base.

Creating full snapshots

For creating a full snapshot, you can use the following API command:

curl --unix-socket /tmp/firecracker.socket -i \
    -X PUT 'http://localhost/snapshot/create' \
    -H  'Accept: application/json' \
    -H  'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{
            "snapshot_type": "Full",
            "snapshot_path": "./snapshot_file",
            "mem_file_path": "./mem_file",
            "version": "0.23.0"
    }'

Details about the required and optional fields can be found in the swagger definition.

Note: If the files indicated by snapshot_path and mem_file_path don't exist at the specified paths, then they will be created right before generating the snapshot.

Prerequisites: The microVM is Paused.

Effects:

  • on success:

    • The file indicated by snapshot_path (e.g. /path/to/snapshot_file) contains the devices' model state and emulation state. The one indicated by mem_file_path(e.g. /path/to/mem_file) contains a full copy of the guest memory.
    • The generated snapshot files are immediately available to be used (current process releases ownership). At this point, the block devices backing files should be backed up externally by the user. Please note that block device contents are only guaranteed to be committed/flushed to the host FS, but not necessarily to the underlying persistent storage (could still live in host FS cache).
    • If diff snapshots were enabled, the snapshot creation resets then the dirtied page bitmap and marks all pages clean (from a diff snapshot point of view).
    • If a version is specified, the new snapshot is saved at that version, otherwise it will be saved at the same version of the running Firecracker. The version is only used for the microVM state file as it contains internal state structures for device emulation, vCPUs and others that can change their format from a Firecracker version to another. Versioning is not required for the block and memory files. The separate block device file components of the snapshot have to be handled by the user.

  • on failure: no side-effects.

Creating diff snapshots

For creating a diff snapshot, you should use the same API command, but with snapshot_type field set to Diff.

Note: If not specified, snapshot_type is by default Full.

curl --unix-socket /tmp/firecracker.socket -i \
    -X PUT 'http://localhost/snapshot/create' \
    -H  'Accept: application/json' \
    -H  'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{
            "snapshot_type": "Diff",
            "snapshot_path": "./snapshot_file",
            "mem_file_path": "./mem_file",
            "version": "0.23.0"
    }'

Prerequisites: The microVM is Paused.

Note: On a fresh microVM, track_dirty_pages field should be set to true, when configuring the /machine-config resource, while on a snapshot loaded microVM, enable_diff_snapshots from PUT /snapshot/loadrequest body, should be set.

Effects:

  • on success:
    • The file indicated by snapshot_path contains the devices' model state and emulation state, same as when creating a full snapshot. The one indicated by mem_file_path contains this time a diff copy of the guest memory; the diff consists of the memory pages which have been dirtied since the last snapshot creation or since the creation of the microVM, whichever of these events was the most recent.
    • All the other effects mentioned in the Effects paragraph from Creating full snapshots section apply here.
  • on failure: no side-effects.

Note: This is an example of an API command that enables dirty page tracking:

curl --unix-socket /tmp/firecracker.socket -i  \
    -X PUT 'http://localhost/machine-config' \
    -H 'Accept: application/json'            \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json'      \
    -d '{
            "vcpu_count": 2,
            "mem_size_mib": 1024,
            "ht_enabled": false,
            "track_dirty_pages": true
    }'

Enabling this support enables KVM dirty page tracking, so it comes at a cost (which consists of CPU cycles spent by KVM accounting for dirtied pages); it should only be used when needed.

Creating a snapshot will not influence state, will not stop or end the microVM, it can be used as before, so the microVM can be resumed if you still want to use it. At this point, in case you plan to continue using the current microVM, you should make sure to also copy the disk backing files.

Resuming the microVM

You can resume the microVM by sending the following API command:

curl --unix-socket /tmp/firecracker.socket -i \
    -X PATCH 'http://localhost/vm' \
    -H 'Accept: application/json' \
    -H 'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{
            "state": "Resumed"
    }'

Prerequisites: The microVM is Paused. Successive calls of this request are ignored (microVM remains in the running state). Effects:

  • on success: microVM is guaranteed to be Resumed.
  • on failure: no side-effects.

Loading snapshots

If you want to load a snapshot, you can do that only before the microVM is configured (the only resources that can be configured prior are the Logger and the Metrics systems) by sending the following API command:

curl --unix-socket /tmp/firecracker.socket -i \
    -X PUT 'http://localhost/snapshot/load' \
    -H  'Accept: application/json' \
    -H  'Content-Type: application/json' \
    -d '{
            "snapshot_path": "./snapshot_file",
            "mem_file_path": "./mem_file",
            "enable_diff_snapshots": true,
            "resume_vm": false
    }'

Details about the required and optional fields can be found in the swagger definition.

Prerequisites: A full memory snapshot and a microVM state file must be provided. The disk backing files, network interfaces backing TAPs and/or vsock backing socket that were used for the original microVM's configuration should be set up and accessible to the new Firecracker process (in which the microVM is resumed). These host-resources need to be accessible at the same relative paths to the new Firecracker process as they were to the original one.

Effects:

  • on success:
    • The complete microVM state is loaded from snapshot into the current Firecracker process.
    • It then resets the dirtied page bitmap and marks all pages clean (from a diff snapshot point of view).
    • The loaded microVM is now in the Paused state, so it needs to be resumed for it to run.
    • The memory file pointed by mem_file_path must be considered immutable from Firecracker and host point of view. It backs the guest OS memory for read access through the page cache. External modification to this file corrupts the guest memory and leads to undefined behavior.
    • The file indicated by snapshot_path, that is used to load from, is released and no longer used by this process.
    • If enable_diff_snapshots is set, then diff snapshots can be taken afterwards.
    • If resume_vm is set, the vm is automatically resumed if load is successful.
  • on failure: A specific error is reported and then the current Firecracker process is ended (as it might be in an invalid state).

Notes: Please, keep in mind that only by setting to true enable_diff_snapshots, when loading a snapshot, or track_dirty_pages, when configuring the machine on a fresh microVM, you can then create a diff snapshot. Also, track_dirty_pages is not saved when creating a snapshot, so you need to explicitly set enable_diff_snapshots when sending LoadSnapshotcommand if you want to be able to do diff snapshots from a loaded microVM. Another thing that you should be aware of is the following: if a fresh microVM can create diff snapshots, then if you create a full snapshot, the memory file contains the whole guest memory, while if you create a diff one, that file is sparse and only contains the guest dirtied pages. With these in mind, some possible snapshotting scenarios are the following:

  • Boot from a fresh microVM -> Pause -> Create snapshot -> Resume -> Pause -> Create snapshot -> ... ;
  • Boot from a fresh microVM -> Pause -> Create snapshot -> Resume -> Pause -> Resume -> ... -> Pause -> Create snapshot -> ... ;
  • Load snapshot -> Resume -> Pause -> Create snapshot -> Resume -> Pause -> Create snapshot -> ... ;
  • Load snapshot -> Resume -> Pause -> Create snapshot -> Resume -> Pause -> Resume -> ... -> Pause -> Create snapshot -> ... ; where Create snapshot can refer to either a full or a diff snapshot for all the aforementioned flows.

It is also worth knowing, a microVM that is restored from snapshot will be resumed with the guest OS wall-clock continuing from the moment of the snapshot creation. For this reason, the wall-clock should be updated to the current time, on the guest-side. More details on how you could do this can be found at a related FAQ.

Provisioning host disk space for snapshots

Depending on VM memory size, snapshots can consume a lot of disk space. Firecracker integrators must ensure that the provisioned disk space is sufficient for normal operation of their service as well as during failure scenarios. If the service exposes the snapshot triggers to customers, integrators must enforce proper disk quotas to avoid any DoS threats that would cause the service to fail or function abnormally.

Ensure continued network connectivity for clones

For recomandations related to continued network connectivity for multiple clones created from a single Firecracker microVM snapshot please see this doc.

Snapshot security and uniqueness

When snapshots are used in a such a manner that a given guest's state is resumed from more than once, guest information assumed to be unique may in fact not be; this information can include identifiers, random numbers and random number seeds, the guest OS entropy pool, as well as cryptographic tokens. Without a strong mechanism that enables users to guarantee that unique things stay unique across snapshot restores, we consider resuming execution from the same state more than once insecure.

For more information please see this doc

Usage examples

Example 1: secure usage (currently in dev preview)

Boot microVM A -> ... -> Create snapshot S -> Terminate
                                           -> Load S in microVM B -> Resume -> ...

Here, microVM A terminates after creating the snapshot without ever resuming work, and a single microVM B resumes execution from snapshot S. In this case, unique identifiers, random numbers, and cryptographic tokens that are meant to be used once are indeed only used once. In this example, we consider microVM B secure.

Example 2: potentially insecure usage

Boot microVM A -> ... -> Create snapshot S -> Resume -> ...
                                           -> Load S in microVM B -> Resume -> ...

Here, both microVM A and B do work staring from the state stored in snapshot S. Unique identifiers, random numbers, and cryptographic tokens that are meant to be used once may be used twice. It doesn't matter if microVM A is terminated before microVM B resumes execution from snapshot S or not. In this example, we consider both microVMs insecure as soon as microVM A resumes execution.

Example 3: potentially insecure usage

Boot microVM A -> ... -> Create snapshot S -> ...
                                           -> Load S in microVM B -> Resume -> ...
                                           -> Load S in microVM C -> Resume -> ...
                                           [...]

Here, both microVM B and C do work starting from the state stored in snapshot S. Unique identifiers, random numbers, and cryptographic tokens that are meant to be used once may be used twice. It doesn't matter at which points in time microVMs B and C resume execution, or if microVM A terminates or not after the snapshot is created. In this example, we consider microVMs B and C insecure, and we also consider microVM A insecure if it resumes execution.

Reusing snapshotted states securely

We are currently working to add a functionality that will notify guest operating systems of the snapshot event in order to enable secure reuse of snapshotted microVM states, guest operating systems, language runtimes, and cryptographic libraries. In some cases, user applications will need to handle the snapshot create/restore events in such a way that the uniqueness and randomness properties are preserved and guaranteed before resuming the workload.

We've started a discussion on how the Linux operating system might securely handle being snapshotted here.

Known Issues

Vsock device limitations

  1. Vsock must be inactive during snapshot:

    Vsock device can break if snapshotted while having active connections. Firecracker snapshots do not capture any inflight network or vsock (through the linux unix domain socket backend) traffic that has left or not yet entered Firecracker.

    The above, coupled with the fact that Vsock control protocol is not resilient to vsock packet loss, leads to Vsock device breakage when doing a snapshot while there are active Vsock connections.

    Workaround: Close all active Vsock connections prior to snapshotting the VM.

  2. Incremental/diff snapshots are not yet supported for Vsock devices. Creating a diff snapshot on a microVM with a vsock device configured is not allowed.