Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

enhancement idea: redirects / reverse proxy config #15

Open
techieshark opened this issue Jun 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Open

enhancement idea: redirects / reverse proxy config #15

techieshark opened this issue Jun 24, 2020 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@techieshark
Copy link

It'd be great to have a simple UI to help people unfamiliar with nginx redirects & proxy rules create those.

Presumably, there's demand for this - here's a WP plugin with like 1 million installs devoted just to setting up redirects. https://wordpress.org/plugins/redirection/

OTOH, maybe that's duplicative of https://nginxproxymanager.com/

@schenkd
Copy link
Owner

schenkd commented Jun 25, 2020

Hello @techieshark, thank you for your suggestion for improvement. If I understand this correctly, the application should abstract the configuration by using for example a wizard? I find the idea really good and interesting. But I also think that the application has no other issues that need to be solved first. So I would put this issue aside and work on it as soon as we get to this point. You are welcome to push the development yourself and leave a PR there with the feature. :)

@schenkd schenkd added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 25, 2020
@LucaNerlich
Copy link
Contributor

Maybe add some "prepared" snippets, such as 301 redirects for non https traffic etc. Or a toggle for "write this domains nginx logs into separate file".

@techieshark
Copy link
Author

@schenkd hi, thanks! Yeah no huge rush but if that changes I'll submit a PR, thank you :)

If I understand this correctly, the application should abstract the configuration by using for example a wizard?

Yep, that's exactly that I was thinking.

@LucaNerlich : Maybe add some "prepared" snippets, such as 301 redirects for non https traffic etc.

That sounds like a great idea too, even if perhaps as the interim solution. Thanks for the idea, Luca!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants