-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 127
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feat(lb): health_check block #1988
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Codecov Report
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #1988 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 74.04% 74.03% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 182 182
Lines 28655 28906 +251
==========================================
+ Hits 21217 21402 +185
- Misses 5635 5690 +55
- Partials 1803 1814 +11
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think that this was started without a lot of agreement with the product team. Could we have a check with them and with @yfodil too?
} | ||
`, | ||
Check: resource.ComposeTestCheckFunc( | ||
resource.TestCheckResourceAttr("scaleway_lb_backend.bkd01", "health_check.#", "1"), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Check that the health check in created
No description provided.