Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

PJM - Regulation market assumptions #39

Open
amoorinvinity opened this issue May 26, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

PJM - Regulation market assumptions #39

amoorinvinity opened this issue May 26, 2022 · 0 comments

Comments

@amoorinvinity
Copy link

Hi, I was just wondering if there was anywhere that;
a) Outlined what the default PJM market assumptions were for Regulation D service (i.e. in terms of performance score, average benefits factor. I'm struggling to align the RMPCP revenue portion when running PJM analysis with a few typical battery assumptions that I would have expected.

b) If there was anyway to update or modify some of the assumptions to test different performing assets?

Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant