Print time summary for tasks when running in parallel

[t1ernan]

Hi! Just found cargo-make! Very impressive tool and feature rich.

I"m trying to setup a basic CI flow, and enabled parallelisation for my tasks, but I noticed when enabling parallelization the time summary information disappears from the std output.

i.e. when my makefile contains

[tasks.format]
command = "cargo"
args = ["fmt", "--", "--emit=files"]

[tasks.ci]
workspace = false
run_task = { name = ["format"], parallel = true }

and I run it like so

cargo make -e CARGO_MAKE_CI=true ci

I get the time series info without actually any mention of the format task time output. This leads to the build time not equaling the sum of the build steps. Without the parallel flag, it behaves as expected.

[cargo-make] INFO - Running Task: ci
[cargo-make] INFO - Running Task: install-rustfmt
[cargo-make] INFO - Running Task: format
[cargo-make] INFO - Execute Command: "cargo" "fmt" "--" "--emit=files"
[cargo-make] INFO - ==================Time Summary==================
[cargo-make] INFO - [Setup Env]:                49.45%     0.14 seconds
[cargo-make] INFO - [Setup Env - Crate Info]:   23.08%     0.06 seconds
[cargo-make] INFO - [Setup Env - Rust]:         20.51%     0.06 seconds
[cargo-make] INFO - [Setup Env - Git]:          5.86%      0.02 seconds
[cargo-make] INFO - [Load Makefiles]:           1.10%      0.00 seconds
[cargo-make] INFO - [Setup Env - Duckscript]:   0.00%      0.00 seconds
[cargo-make] INFO - [Setup Env - CI]:           0.00%      0.00 seconds
[cargo-make] INFO - [Setup Env - Project]:      0.00%      0.00 seconds
[cargo-make] INFO - [Setup Env - Vars]:         0.00%      0.00 seconds
[cargo-make] INFO - ci:                         0.00%      0.00 seconds
[cargo-make] INFO - ================================================
[cargo-make] INFO - Build Done in 0.34 seconds.

Since I'm new to cargo-make, I'm not sure if this is just a limitation of running parallel on workspace when workspace is disabled

Thanks!

[sagiegurari]

sorry for the really late response. many times i miss the discussion posts.
anyhow, i agree, there is an issue here where parallel tasks run in threads and their data is lost.
i admit i'm not sure how to solve it since when doing parallel, you can put there a list of tasks that run in parallel (thats the point of it) and if i write their output to the above list, it will make little sense and confuse users.
i'm open for suggestions.