You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Dear nichenetr team,
I did run nichnetr on my single cell dataset. I do have problem choosing the best potential ligand. I have observed discrepancies in my analysis results, particularly with regards to the relationship between ligand expression levels and log fold change (LFC).
Specifically, I noticed instances where a ligand exhibits low expression levels but a high LFC, and conversely, where a ligand shows high expression levels but a negative LFC (like LAMA2 in the below plot). Could you please provide insight into the interpretation of these findings? I am unsure if this discrepancy reflects an error in my approach or if there is a specific biological interpretation behind these observations.
Moreover, I was wondering what is the best ligand activity AUPR as if I compare with other ligands the range might not be good enough overall.
Thank you very much for your help on this matter.
Paria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Dear nichenetr team,
I did run nichnetr on my single cell dataset. I do have problem choosing the best potential ligand. I have observed discrepancies in my analysis results, particularly with regards to the relationship between ligand expression levels and log fold change (LFC).
Specifically, I noticed instances where a ligand exhibits low expression levels but a high LFC, and conversely, where a ligand shows high expression levels but a negative LFC (like LAMA2 in the below plot). Could you please provide insight into the interpretation of these findings? I am unsure if this discrepancy reflects an error in my approach or if there is a specific biological interpretation behind these observations.
Moreover, I was wondering what is the best ligand activity AUPR as if I compare with other ligands the range might not be good enough overall.
Thank you very much for your help on this matter.
Paria
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: