Differences with sh1107

[PvdBerg1998]

Happy new year!

I've got some sh1107's lying around and they seem very similar to the sh1106. In fact, they appear to work with this crate, or at least I was able to render some text. However, their resolution is 64x128 instead of 128x64. I've tried to add this resolution to your code but I got stuck on the i2c send implementation assuming a 128 byte array. Do you know if this is easily fixable?

Thanks in advance!

Edit: I've tried rendering at 90 degrees, which works sort of. The coordinate 0,0 renders to 0,32 (left middle), so something is wrong with the coordinate transform.

[PvdBerg1998]

I've implemented my own tiny driver. Just fyi, it appears that the screen is shifted 32 pixels to the right, meaning 0,0 is actually 32,0.

[aaron-hardin]

I would also be interested in the sh1107, though I guess that would be it's own crate.
I found these resources but haven't verified the command differences with the datasheets:

• https://www.espruino.com/modules/SH1106.js
• https://www.espruino.com/modules/SH1107.js

It seems that (according to the code above) the following commands are different:

• 2 suggested ratio
• 3 set multiplex
• 5 display offset
• 18 set vcom detect

[aaron-hardin]

I got a fork working here: https://github.com/aaron-hardin/sh1107
It's not pretty but it's working for the most part. It has some stray pixels along the top but other than that uses the full display.

[DanCrank]

I found that bumping the DisplayOffset from 0x60 to 0x62 cleaned up the two uninitialized columns of pixels on my hardware (Adafruit 64x128 OLED FeatherWing). I have no idea why this is the case, since the C++ driver uses 0x60 and works fine on the same hardware.

@aaron-hardin, thanks for the fork!