-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 60
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
SSNR is 10.4 #23
Comments
We encountered the same problem, with the SSNR indicator only 10.4 and each indicator slightly lower |
report my results:
In the following metrics the first numbers are from the TABLE I of the paper (https://arxiv.org/pdf/2209.11112.pdf), and the second ones are my results. All the results are similar except the SSNR. PESQ: 3.41 --> 3.41 despite the inconsistent numbers between code and paper, i'm quite satisfied the performance with our own data. |
We got some complains about SSNR and it is currently being checked. |
I want to ask if I use the VCTK-DEMAND dataset to train, whether I need downsample the trainset to 16khz first or input the original data. |
You need to downsample the data first.
…On Fri, 17 Nov 2023, 2:39 am moshengmao, ***@***.***> wrote:
- use ffmpeg to downsample the source data from 48khz to 16khz
I want to ask if I use the VCTK-DEMAND dataset to train, whether I need
downsample the trainset to 16khz first or input the original data.
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#23 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKAXVH5UI7QPAJZVNRVY54TYE253TAVCNFSM6AAAAAAVNOHMV2VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43OSLTON2WKQ3PNVWWK3TUHMYTQMJVGYYTAOJQGY>
.
You are receiving this because you commented.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
I used your open-source code in github, ran evaluation.py, and also downloaded VCTK+DEMAND data. The model in it uses the model checkpoint you left on github in best_ckpt folder. Because the source data is 48000hz, I added the resampling part in the code. After running evaluation.py, the SSNR of the result is only 10.4, and other indicators are also slightly lower than the paper. If you have any opinions, I would appreciate it very much.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: