You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
C++20 is one of the more attractive C++ standard versions for our purpose, for example std::string_view and std::span are something that will be hugely useful in modernizing the rpm codebase.
Looking at https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html, gcc's support for C++20 was pretty complete by gcc-12 already except for modules. So in retrospective we might've just as well started with that because modules aren't interesting to us yet, but it's a bit late to change the baseline for 6.0 now. Lets plan to make this jump post 6.0, probably after 6.0 beta is out to avoid creating too many backport pains during stabilization.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
C++20 is one of the more attractive C++ standard versions for our purpose, for example std::string_view and std::span are something that will be hugely useful in modernizing the rpm codebase.
Looking at https://gcc.gnu.org/projects/cxx-status.html, gcc's support for C++20 was pretty complete by gcc-12 already except for modules. So in retrospective we might've just as well started with that because modules aren't interesting to us yet, but it's a bit late to change the baseline for 6.0 now. Lets plan to make this jump post 6.0, probably after 6.0 beta is out to avoid creating too many backport pains during stabilization.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: