Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

question about organized point cloud #313

Closed
Zhang-Qinghui opened this issue Nov 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Closed

question about organized point cloud #313

Zhang-Qinghui opened this issue Nov 12, 2019 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@Zhang-Qinghui
Copy link

Zhang-Qinghui commented Nov 12, 2019

Please complete the following information:

  • OS and Version: Ubuntu 16.04
  • ROS Version: Kinetic
  • Built from Source
  • Version: commit 7208295

Describe the bug
hi, organized clouds could be accessed in a matrix fashion and I have tried, but I have one thing don't understand. Does the point under the same index number in the ordered point cloud of different frames come from the same position in the actual space?
2019-11-12 18-49-00屏幕截图
the picture shows the point at Column 8 line 180 of pointclouds from the different frames,and the velodyne is fixed, the environment is constant. But the point data is different. Shouldn't the data be the same? thank you in advance.

Expected behavior
I want some explanation about the problem.

@JWhitleyWork
Copy link
Contributor

@Zhang-Qinghui - There is an inherent problem with the current driver's implementation regarding the size of a "scan" - see #285 for explanation. The organized point cloud feature can only organize the data that it is given and, since the driver is inconsistent on the size of a "scan," the precise location of a point within a scan is currently non-deterministic. If you would like to work on this PR to fix this issue, help would be welcome.

@Zhang-Qinghui
Copy link
Author

Thanks for your reply. I think it's because the rotation speed of the radar is unstable.This is a hardware problem.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants