You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the bug
hi, organized clouds could be accessed in a matrix fashion and I have tried, but I have one thing don't understand. Does the point under the same index number in the ordered point cloud of different frames come from the same position in the actual space?
the picture shows the point at Column 8 line 180 of pointclouds from the different frames,and the velodyne is fixed, the environment is constant. But the point data is different. Shouldn't the data be the same? thank you in advance.
Expected behavior
I want some explanation about the problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@Zhang-Qinghui - There is an inherent problem with the current driver's implementation regarding the size of a "scan" - see #285 for explanation. The organized point cloud feature can only organize the data that it is given and, since the driver is inconsistent on the size of a "scan," the precise location of a point within a scan is currently non-deterministic. If you would like to work on this PR to fix this issue, help would be welcome.
Please complete the following information:
Describe the bug
hi, organized clouds could be accessed in a matrix fashion and I have tried, but I have one thing don't understand. Does the point under the same index number in the ordered point cloud of different frames come from the same position in the actual space?
the picture shows the point at Column 8 line 180 of pointclouds from the different frames,and the velodyne is fixed, the environment is constant. But the point data is different. Shouldn't the data be the same? thank you in advance.
Expected behavior
I want some explanation about the problem.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: