Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Investigate feasibility of super linter GH workflow #53

Open
pallasite99 opened this issue Jul 11, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

Investigate feasibility of super linter GH workflow #53

pallasite99 opened this issue Jul 11, 2022 · 0 comments
Labels
spike Exploration activity. Ends in creating concrete issues.

Comments

@pallasite99
Copy link
Member

The idea here is to basically have one workflow internally call the static checks required for a commit to a repo.

Ex: If I make a change only to a json file, I don't need to run a go static check.

This is done by a GH action called super linter, which does all of this internally after getting triggered during the action config specified. More info here:

https://github.com/github/super-linter

An example of this (check commit history):

https://github.com/pallasite99/customer_risk_analysis_api

This will make our CI workflow simpler and only run what is required, instead of POs commenting out or deleting unneeded workflows manually.

@pallasite99 pallasite99 added the spike Exploration activity. Ends in creating concrete issues. label Jul 12, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
spike Exploration activity. Ends in creating concrete issues.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant