You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Ideally, we support a wide range of different object stores and filesystems. That way users can run Restate also w/o an object store. Moreover, the upload process should happen in the background.
As mentioned in #1882 (comment), please let me know if there's anything we can do from the opendal side.
We have recently polished our VISION to One Layer, All Storage with the Open Community, Solid Foundation, Fast Access, Object Storage First, and Extensible Architecture principles. We are also actively working towards our v1.0 release.
Hey @Xuanwo, I unfortunately only just saw your comment yesterday. We evaluated OpenDAL and decided to go with object_store for the first iteration of our snapshotting integration because of its narrower focus. Our requirements are very simple at the moment (just GET and multi-part PUT against a handful of services for the foreseeable future), but thanks very much for getting in touch and we'll certainly keep re-evaluating this as our needs evolve!
Ideally, we support a wide range of different object stores and filesystems. That way users can run Restate also w/o an object store. Moreover, the upload process should happen in the background.
Libraries to look at could be: https://crates.io/crates/opendal and https://crates.io/crates/object_store.
Tasks
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: