We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
@tony612 I tried to reproduce ~10x speed improvement mentioned in darkofabijan/grpc-stress-test#7 (comment) but got only ~10% speedup (single request takes 40ms instead of 44ms): https://semaphoreci.com/renderedtext/grpc-stress/branches/master/builds/3 vs https://semaphoreci.com/renderedtext/grpc-stress/branches/pr-cb_speedup/builds/2 (look at the last command output).
PR #5 is how I used https://github.com/tony612/chatterbox/tree/speedup Is there something I missed?
(I get the same results on my notebook)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I don't know the problem.But there're some differences between yours and mine:
{:ok, channel} = GRPC.Stub.connect("localhost:50051") Enum.each 1..100000, fn(x) -> reply = channel |> Helloworld.Greeter.Stub.say_hello(Helloworld.HelloRequest.new(name: Integer.to_string(x))) if rem(x, 1000) == 0 do IO.puts "#{Time.utc_now} #{x}" IO.inspect reply end end
Sorry, something went wrong.
I added elixir server to comparison and tried both:
Get the same performance?
No branches or pull requests
@tony612
I tried to reproduce ~10x speed improvement mentioned in darkofabijan/grpc-stress-test#7 (comment) but got only ~10% speedup (single request takes 40ms instead of 44ms):
https://semaphoreci.com/renderedtext/grpc-stress/branches/master/builds/3 vs
https://semaphoreci.com/renderedtext/grpc-stress/branches/pr-cb_speedup/builds/2
(look at the last command output).
PR #5 is how I used https://github.com/tony612/chatterbox/tree/speedup
Is there something I missed?
(I get the same results on my notebook)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: