-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 997
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
chore(docs): background check documentation update #11599
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -165,7 +165,10 @@ These options allows you to disable the generation of test and story files. | |
There are new versions of the framework all the time—a major every couple months, a minor every week or two, and patches when appropriate. | ||
And if you're on an experimental release line, like canary, there's new versions every day, multiple times. | ||
|
||
If you'd like to get notified (at most, once a day) when there's a new version, set `versionUpdates` to include the version tags you're interested in. | ||
If you'd like to get notified (at most, once a day) when there's a new version, set `versionUpdates` to an array of the version tags you're interested in (tags listed earlier take priority). | ||
While you can specify any tag, common options include: `latest`, `canary`, `next`, or `rc`. | ||
|
||
To opt out of background version checks entirely, simply remove the `versionUpdates` option, comment it out, or set its value to an empty array `[""]`. | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. This is me guessing here on ways to disable this. I have not tested these! 🙏 |
||
|
||
## Using Environment Variables in `redwood.toml` | ||
|
||
|
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
@@ -2279,10 +2279,12 @@ yarn redwood upgrade -t 0.19.3 | |||||
|
||||||
The CLI can check for things in the background, like new versions of the framework, while you dev. | ||||||
|
||||||
Right now it can only check for new versions. | ||||||
If you'd like it to do so, set `notifications.versionUpdates` in the `redwood.toml` file to include an array of the tags you're interested in hearing about. | ||||||
(The former has priority.) | ||||||
Right now it defaults to check for a new `latest` version. | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I think "checking" is the more correct form of the verb here 🙂 |
||||||
To customize this behavior - perhaps by checking for `rc` (release candidate) or other tags - set `notifications.versionUpdates` in the `redwood.toml` file to include an array of the tags you're interested in. | ||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||
Tags listed earlier in the array have priority. | ||||||
|
||||||
By default, the CLI won't check for upgrades—you have to opt into it. | ||||||
You can opt out of the background check process. | ||||||
|
||||||
You'll see this notification once a day at most. And the CLI will check for it once a day at most. So, nothing heavy-handed going on here. | ||||||
You'll see this notification once a day at most. And the CLI will check for an upgrade once a day, at most. So, nothing heavy-handed going on here. | ||||||
|
||||||
For more details, see the [TOML configuration section in the documentation](app-configuration-redwood-toml.md#cli). |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
These notes exist in the upgrade.js file... if these are all still valid tags, then I will update this PR to the above suggestion.
and
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you're going with your suggestion Barrett there are a couple of small tweaks I'd do to it. Right now there are two "or", and a missing comma.
With those corrections it'd look like this:
I'll let @Josh-Walker-GM comment on the validity of all those choices