Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Error: invalid or not allowed setting 'bridge-port': 'bridge-port' not among [connection, 802-3-ethernet (ethernet), 802-1x, dcb, sriov, ethtool, match, ipv4, ipv6, tc, proxy].\n", "name": "em1", "rc": 2} #400

Open
andreaskaris opened this issue Mar 5, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@andreaskaris
Copy link

Since fecd7b2 we run into:

fatal: [hypervisor]: FAILED! => {"changed": false, "msg": "Error: invalid or not allowed setting 'bridge-port': 'bridge-port' not among [connection, 802-3-ethernet (ethernet), 802-1x, dcb, sriov, ethtool, match, ipv4, ipv6, tc, proxy].\n", "name": "em1", "rc": 2}

That seems to be related to:

ansible/ansible@5684dac

We are still installing on rhel 7.9 --- did you switch to rhel 8 and that's why this fails for us?

Thanks

@MaxBab
Copy link
Contributor

MaxBab commented Mar 7, 2021

Hi @andreaskaris ,

Yes, infrared moved to rhel 8.x in its support.
Please, start using rhel 8.x OS, and the issue will be solved.

@fhubik
Copy link
Contributor

fhubik commented Mar 8, 2021

I'll try to clarify a bit more.

IR did not switch to RHEL8.x as that step would require all plugins and core to be branched or refactored to remove RHEL7.X related code/conditionals. That is not likely to happen as it would introduce risk and consume significant amount of resources for little gain. The more probable way is that IR (already is) will be supporting both versions (both as virthost version and vm node image), the difference is majority of deployments and underlying CI infra are currently shifted to RHEL8.x focus, which means also the IR maintenance shifted. That doesn't mean the supported is dropped.

Of course that doesn't mean RHEL7.x related flows can not be maintained by certain groups/community (I am aware of these still being deployed) who are using them, just it will likely possess more issues as the main focus/deployment pool shifted.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants